Influences: James Lee Burke

I don’t know if my fellow Maine Crime Writers are up for this game, but I’m curious to hear about the crime authors who inspired you to begin writing in this genre. Sometimes it’s not immediately apparent from a person’s novels which other authors had a profound impact on their creation. I’ve cited my affection for P.D. James before, but obviously I write nothing like Baroness James of Holland Park. I’ll get the ball rolling in the hope that someone else will pick it up.

Because I write about a Maine game warden, my books are often grouped with those of C.J. Box (who writes about a Wyoming warden) or with Nevada Barr (who writes about a National Park Service ranger). That’s exceedingly good company in which to find oneself, and I understand the “read-alike” thinking. Box, Barr, and I all write mysteries set in the outdoors, and we take great care to describe the natural with the same attention to detail that someone like James Ellroy brings to the naked city.

But if you asked which contemporary crime writer has influenced me the most, I would have to say James Lee Burke. I first encountered Burke in a college creative writing class. His short story, “The Convict,” appeared in the 1986 Best American Short Stories anthology edited by Raymond Carver, and I remember being blown away by the vividness of its descriptions. Burke published the story while the character of his great Cajun detective, Dave Robicheaux, was still taking shape in his imagination, but you can hear his signature style in the opening paragraph:

My father was a popular man in New Iberia, even though his ideas were different from most people’s and his attitudes were uncompromising. On Friday afternoons he and my mother and I would drive down the long yellow dirt road through the sugarcane fields until it became blacktop and followed the Bayou Teche into town, where my father would drop my mother off at Musemeche’s Produce Market and take me with him to the bar at the Frederic Hotel. The Frederic was a wonderful old place with slot machines and potted palms and marble columns in the lobby, and a gleaming mahogany and brass barroom that was cooled by long-bladed wooden fans. I always sat at a table with a bottle of Dr. Nut and a glass of ice and watched with fascination the drinking rituals of my father and his friends: the warm handshakes, the pats on the shoulder, the laughter that was genuine but never uncontrolled. In the summer, which seemed like the only season in south Louisiana, the men wore seersucker suits and straw hats, and the amber light in their glasses of whiskey with ice and their Havana cigars and Picayune cigarettes held between their ringed fingers made them seem everything gentlemen and my father’s friends should be.

Vivid descriptions and a nostalgic wistfulness are the hallmarks of Burke’s prose. All of his books, or at least the ones I’ve read, take place after a fall from grace. That prior Eden might have been an illusion in a child’s eyes, but the world seemed to have been a better place once, long ago. Modern America is downright hellish in Burke’s books: a pandemonium populated by an ever-expanding horde of physically, psychologically, and morally deformed characters. (The morally deformed ones are the worst and tend to belong to the upper levels of society.) Let’s just say that James Lee Burke takes a dim view of human nature.

Against these degenerates stands a deeply flawed but righteous man, Detective Dave Robicheaux. (Burke has several series going, but his other main protagonists, attorney Billy Bob Holland and his cousin Sheriff Hackberry Holland, seem like cuttings sliced from the same cypress.) Big-hearted but quick to anger, generous to a fault but brutally violent, Robicheaux is one of the great characters in contemporary literature. Like his creator, Dave is a practicing Catholic and a recovering alcoholic. In his eyes, human beings are self-wounding sinners, and he sees them with a clarity that only comes from having hit one too many bottoms. Here he is in A Stained White Radiance:

As a police officer it has been my experience that pedophiles are able to operate and stay functional over long periods of time and victimize scores, even hundreds, of children, because no one wants to believe his or her own intuitions about the symptoms in a perpetrator. We are repelled and sickened by the images that our minds suggest, and we hope against hope that problem is in reality simply one of misperceptions.

Systematic physical cruelty toward children belongs in the same shoebox. Nobody wants to deal with it. I cannot remember one occasion, in my entire life, when I saw one adult interfere in a public place with the mistreatment of a child at the hands of another adult.

Burke wrote those words in 1992, nearly two decades before the world ever heard the name Jerry Sandusky.

My wife and I talk about what we call “Dave Robicheaux moments” we have witnessed. If a pack of drunk men are catcalling girls on a corner, Dave doesn’t cross the street to avoid them. If a mother slaps her child in a supermarket parking lot, he doesn’t stand by gawking, as you or I might be inclined to do; he intervenes. Robicheaux is a man of action—often violent action—who steps into situations where the rest of us fear to tread.

If this all sounds unremittingly bleak, I am afraid it is. There are few moments of emotional uplift in a James Lee Burke novel. There are, however, many passages of gorgeous writing, usually focused on the natural world. Take this paragraph from the Edgar-winning Black Cherry Blues:

Late that afternoon the wind shifted out of the south and you could smell the wetlands and just a hint of salt in the air. Then a bank of thunderheads slid across the sky from the Gulf, tumbling across the sun like cannon smoke, and the light gathered in the oaks and cypress and willow trees and took a strange green cast as though you were looking at the world through water. It rained hard, dancing on the bayou and the lily pads in the shallows, clattering on my gallery and rabbit hutches, lighting the freshly plowed fields with a black sheen.

Now I’ve never been to Louisiana, but I can see that image so clearly in my mind’s eye that it reads like a memory. It’s the sort of powerful nature writing to which I aspire in my own books. If I can transport a reader to the Maine woods the way Burke brings us routinely to the bayous of Louisiana, I will consider my work well done.

Burke’s writing can get a little overripe at times (so could Chandler’s, though), and his plots seem to involve lots bad people showing up on Dave’s doorstep, or Dave showing up on theirs, for the purposes of exchanging threatening words with each other. Then there will be a shooting or a fistfight. At one point in the book, some scarred and haunted man will torture another scarred and haunted man in a desolate, windswept place.

But you don’t read a James Lee Burke novel to solve a puzzle-box mystery. You read if for the power of the prose and the strength of the characterizations, and for the way it returns you to a fully realized world that resembles the one we live in is so closely it forces you to take stock of your own moral and physical courage. Burke refuses to comfort or condescend to his readers, and that is what makes him great.

Posted in Paul's Posts, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | 7 Comments

Interview with Janis Bolster

When the crime fiction finalist list for the Maine Literary Awards came out, there were two very familiar names on it–Maine Crime Writers’ own Paul Doiron for Trespasser and Gerry Boyle for Port City Black and White. The third finalist, the rose among the thorns if you will, was less familiar–Janis Bolster for The Lost Daughters. Janis lives in mid-coast Maine and writes crime fiction set in Maine, so naturally the Maine Crime Writers wanted to know all about her.  She graciously answers our questions here.

Janis will appear–along with most of the Maine Crime Writers and a host of other wonderful Maine authors including Tess Gerritsen, at Books in Boothbay, Maine’s Summer Book Fair on July 14.

Janis Bolster

Hi Janis. Welcome to Maine Crime Writers.  Can you tell us about your Maine connection and about the journey that led you to crime writing and Maine?

Thank you. It’s great to be here in such exciting company.

I grew up in Maine and moved back in the 1990s, after living elsewhere in New England, in the Midwest, and in California.

I’ve worked in editing most of my life, and I’ve always compared book notes with copy editors and proofreaders who do projects for me. When I realized that almost all of them love mysteries as much as I do, I got the idea for the Sally Jean Chalmers Editorial Mystery series. The first book, Murder in Two Tenses, is set in a fictional coastal Connecticut town, but I moved The Lost Daughters to Portland, Maine. I love Portland. I lived there briefly, and when I left, I had a massive case of homesickness. Every time I came back to Maine to visit family, I spent time in Portland researching the book. Now I live in Midcoast Maine, and my love affair with Portland has widened to include the entire Maine coast.

Tell us about your series heroine, Sally Jean Chalmers.

In Murder in Two Tenses, Sally is a lowly editorial assistant just hired by a university press. One of her first projects is a true-crime historical study, and she does everything from line editing (fixing spelling and unscrambling tangled sentences) to trying to make sense of factual inconsistencies. In The Lost Daughters, she’s left that job and started freelancing, with uncomfortable effects on her finances. When she gets hired by an assistant professor at the fictional Cumberland College in Portland, she’s doing a very different kind of editorial work: reading a nineteenth-century Portland diary and helping the professor choose selections to publish.

Sally is just twenty-three at the outset of the series and finding her way. She’s passionate about her work, but her expectations change as she meets people and deals with new kinds of pressures. Her inexperience, especially in the first book, creates some of the problems that snare her. I think readers like watching a character grow and change as she learns from mistakes and discovers which instincts she can trust.

In both your published mysteries, Murder in Two Tenses and The Lost Daughters, events in the past have an impact on the present. What drew you to these stories and why do you think they are so satisfying?

All my life, I’ve been fascinated by the later nineteenth century. Creating the “historic” documents that reveal mysteries is the thing I like best about the series, and readers tell me they enjoy these glimpses into the past. The historic crime in each mystery may be tied to the contemporary murder by theme or by a real connection, but each book combines past and present.

In Murder in Two Tenses, I was looking for a way to involve a very young editor in at least two major crimes, so I gave Sally a high-pressure project with a lot of built-in problems: copyediting a tricky Victorian murder mystery without much support from her boss, the headmistress of the School of Sink or Swim. The journal used as a source in the manuscript adds another narrator – the detective who struggled with the case in the 1890s – and a more immediate connection to the past. Sally hears echoes of her own problems in the detective’s musings. When she uncovers the evidence that solves a contemporary murder, she also finds the resolution of the 1890s story, and the detective’s final thoughts on the case show her a way to live with both past and present.

For The Lost Daughters, I wanted a family history and a link with Portland and Casco Bay. I turned over lots of possibilities before I came up with the idea I used as the deepest of the Cottrell family secrets. This time the historic source is a diary kept from the 1880s into the twentieth century by a Portland woman who was interested in everything she came across; that gave me the chance to embed details of Portland history and daily life. The diarist knows enough to suspect some of her relatives of horrific acts, but the diary has been censored and the facts are elusive. Treasure hunts enchant me, and I involved Sally in a search for long-missing Cottrell jewels that leads ultimately to the truth about both the family’s history and its current choices.

This spring, you were a crime fiction finalist in the Maine Literary Awards competition along with Maine Crime Writers Paul Doiron and Gerry Boyle. How did you feel when you found out? What’s the reaction been?

I was surprised and delighted to be included in such good company. A nomination like this one is hugely encouraging – suddenly people who never heard of you are reading your work.

Your publisher, Reck House Press, is Maine-based. What is their focus?  In an age with so many publishing options, why did you decide to go with a small press and Reck House specifically?

I’m actually part of Reck House Press, so here I can answer as both author and editor-in-chief. Reck House has an editorial board, but once a book gets accepted, I have a lot of control over how my work gets presented. Reck House is committed to quality – that’s its focus. The press’s wonderful designer, Lin Maria Riotto, handles all the aesthetics, and for The Lost Daughters, I had the fun of walking Sally’s routes around Portland with her while she took the photos that became the illustrations in the book, and then walking around the cemetery that provided the base image for the cover. For the earlier mystery, Murder in Two Tenses, I got to watch the wizardry and hard work of creating illustrations as diverse as a believable immigration card, a sketch on a napkin, the front page of an 1898 newspaper, and a comic book cover.

What are you working on now?

A Sally Jean Chalmers mystery called Emily Dickinson in the Attic. While I was doing editorial work on a Dickinson book some years ago, I came up with a theory that I knew I’d like to work into a book one day. The Lost Daughters sets up the background for the story, providing an old house where, in the new mystery, Sally finds letters written to Dickinson by a school friend. Her discovery leads to a murder, and in working with the invented letters, I get to play with my theory.

Janis, thanks so much for talking to us.  You can find out more about Janis’ book Murder in Two Tenses and order it hereThe Lost Daughters is described and can be ordered from Reck House Press, here.

Posted in Guest Blog | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

I Love Fenway Park

Hi. Barb here. And I just want to say, I love Fenway Park. Which is interesting, because honestly, I could care less about baseball.

When I first came to New England as a young bride, (or more precisely a young girlfriend, or young fiancée or young what-the-heck-are-we-doing-exactly-?, depending on who you asked), on the very first evening, I asked Bill, “What are we doing tonight?” and he said, “The Red Sox are on TV.” And, I thought, okay, sounds fine.

Big Papi

When I asked him the same question the next night and got the same answer, it was the first time I realized that baseball, unlike football, isn’t a once-a-week, easily dispensed-with sort of a thing.

Since then, baseball has been the background noise of my summer existence. Usually, quite literally. We had a summer cottage for years where we didn’t have a TV, and I got quite used to, actually got to really enjoy, reading a book with the radio announcers’ chatter, the crack of the bat and the crowd noise in the background.

Sometimes my husband will leave me in the car with the radio on and the score 3-1 to go off and run some errand. Then he’ll come back and the score is 3-11. “Oh my God, what happened?” he’ll yell. And I shrug and say, “I dunno.”

Here are my three all purpose baseball conversation starters.

“What’s the score?” (This can also be a conversation ender, depending).

“What happened?” Useful when spouse or crowd are suddenly cheering or swearing. Also useful for those really esoteric calls that only baseball fans understand.

“Oh, my God, what happened?” Useful for grand slam homeruns, no hitters, bench-clearing brawls and injuries. Baseball injuries always seem scary to me and I say this as someone who has a scar on her lip from being hit by a pitch in a game I wasn’t even playing in.

That’s my entire repertoire.

Cody Ross. He takes his cap off the minute the inning ends, just like my son did in Little League. Maybe he is cursed with the "Ross sweaty head."

Which is why it’s odd that I really love to go to baseball games. I love being outside on summer nights. Or sitting in the sun, as I did last Wednesday, on a lazy summer afternoon, slathered in sun block to ward off the condition a friend of mine calls, “Celtic leprosy.”

Ballparks offer some of the best people-watching anywhere. And there’s so much more that happens on the field when you’re there in person—stuff you can’t se on the TV. I love Fenway, but I also like smaller parks. I’ve seen the Lowell Spinners and been to red Sox training camp in Fort Myers. Seeing the Portland Seadogs is one of the reasons for my goal of spending more time in Portland this summer.

I like baseball movies, too. I could watch Bull Durham, Field of Dreams, A League of Their Own and Fever Pitch in a pretty much endless loop.

But then, of course, none of those movies are really about baseball.

Posted in Barb's Posts | Tagged , , , , | 5 Comments

Murder and Mayhem, Dr. Doug Lyle’s Treasure Trove of Medically Murderous Information

James Hayman:  Lainie Goff, the beautiful young attorney who is murdered in my second thriller The Chill of Night is the victim of something called pithing.  The villain placed the tip of a thin bladed knife (an ice pick would have done as well) into the small indentation at the back of Lainie’s neck just below the spot where the skull joins the neck and pushed the blade in between the C2 and C3 vertebrae.  This severed Lainie’s spinal cord from her brainstem and resulted in virtually instantaneous death.  Her body fell like a marionette that has had its strings cut.

I learned about my villain’s method of dispatching Lainie from Dr. Doug Lyle’s terrific little book Murder and Mayhem which is a compendium of Lyle’s answers to medical and forensic questions sent to him by crime writers all over the country. Lyle is a cardiologist who practices in Southern California but he  has built a second career as an invaluable resource for those of us who need to know about murder and the effect various injuries have on a victim’s body. Most of the questions and answers in the book were originally published in Lyle’s monthly column for the Mystery Writers of America called The Doctor is In.

As I was browsing through Murder and Mayhem again last night, searching for an interesting way to dispatch a victim in my next thriller, I realized once again that Lyle’s book is not only a useful tool for crime writers but that it also makes good reading, full of medical information one might find interesting even if you aren’t planning to knock off a character in a book or, for that matter, your irritating next door neighbor.

For example one of the questions asked by a curious writer and answered by Lyle is What is the mechanism of death in a suicide by hanging? On page 18 we learn, “If the victim drops several feet, the noose would indeed fracture his neck and death would be fairly instantaneous. He would simply fall and hang limply. Yes, he would likely evacuate his bladder and bowels, and the smell would be as expected. On the other hand, if the fall is short, as in kicking a stool or chair out of the way…his neck would not break and death would be from strangulation. It would be slow and painful, with a great deal of kicking and struggling. When death finally occurs…his face would be purplish and engorged with blood. His eyes would protrude, perhaps his tongue would be swollen and protruding, and his neck would be excoriated from the struggle against the rope. Also the conjunctivae––the pink part of the inside of the eyelid––would show petechial hemorrhages.” Lyle goes on to add several more paragraphs of medical information about hanging that the writer might or might not need to know.

Among hundreds of other questions answered in the book are What injuries occur when someone is thrown down a stairway? Find the answer on page 25.  How dangerous is it to transport heroin in a swallowed condom? Page 89. What are the symptoms and treatment of a “sucking chest wound?” Page 43.  How quickly would someone die after drinking alcohol laced with Xanax? Page 184. Do bodies move during cremation? Page 273.

One of my personal favorites is the following question from a writer, Will oleander poison a cat?   The answer to this one (on page 275) is that it depends on the amount. “Have the poisoner give the cat a very small amount, and he will get sick but survive…(For death to occur) just crush up a single leaf or flower and feed it to the cat in some food or meat. That should do it.”

I have no idea why this particular writer wanted to kill a cat or, indeed, if this particular method of “catricide” ever found its way into his or her book.  But at least, in the unlikely event that I decide to murder a household pet in any of my own future books, now I have a method far more interesting than simply stuffing the helpless victim in a bag and tossing it in the ocean.

Posted in Jim's Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

Stealing Words

My name is Lea Wait, and I am a thief.

I steal words.

I don’t steal more than one, or possibly two, at a time, so tracing their origins would be impossible, even for me. I steal them from friends and relatives and CNN commentators. I boldly take them from overheard conversations at grocery stores and farmers’ markets and coffee shops. I slip them away from moments of my life not dedicated to writing, when they sneak into my consciousness at three in the morning, or when I’ll filling up my car at a gas station. But, worst of all, most of the words I’ve stolen come from those in my own profession. I steal from other writers. 

I steal words for the same reason a jeweler might steal a jewel: they are so perfect I can’t resist taking them and making them my own.

I carry a notebook, as most writers do, and it is in that notebook that I capture those precious, fleeting, words. Often they are sensory words. Images. Words I recognize, I admire, but that I don’t always use myself. Or that I suddenly see, or hear, in a different way. That remind me of smells or sights or tastes that may fit in scenes of the book I’m writing. Treasures, to be hoarded. For now. 

I copy them onto lists, and read them over, cherishing the way they feel, the way they sound, before I write a certain scene, or before beginning my work for the day. They are almost a meditation. Sometimes they form themselves into short phrases.

What are some of the words and phrases on my list now, as I plan a new book?

“Wishing stones. Frayed. Wafted. Cobalt blue. Gray skeletal pilings. The scent of lavender in an old pine bureau drawer. The front of the house painted white; the back, wind-grayed. Socked-in. Glowing. Fingers grazing. Skittered. Slog. Fragile. Mud and mould and rotting fish. Screams of fishers in the dark. Creak of hardwood boards. Shabby. Clamoring. Scent of sea lavender. Groggy. Ceiling cracks.”

And many more. Some of those will no doubt end up finding homes in my book. Some will not. But reading them over will remind me of scenes I’ve planned. Remind me why I love writing.

Words are only one of a writer’s tools. Go ahead. Steal some of mine. Used by different authors, they tell different stories. And yet, standing alone or in different company, they contain their own messages; sing their own songs. Sing the magic of language. If my words sing to you … maybe they’re yours, too.

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

Baby, Meet Bathwater

Hello again from Sarah Graves, thinking today about this morning’s headline: “Richard Russo boycotts e-books.” Well, of course he is doing no such thing. He’s simply decided to publish one book, a collaboration with his daughter and son-in-law called Interventions, as a paper-and-print-only production with Down East Books instead. And while I have no personal knowledge of the reasons for his decision, a look at the four-volume Interventions with its lovely covers, slipcase, illustrations, and enclosed print of one of his daughter’s paintings, suggests one: as an ebook, it’s impossible.

You can’t send four different beautiful covers to a Kindle, after all, nor will that slipcover travel well electronically. I haven’t seen inside the book, but I suspect the full effect of its illustrations might not translate to a lowish-resolution screen. The print of the illustrator’s painting, too, is a problem; you can only see it with your e-reader turned on, not propped up against your reading lamp so it’s the first thing you lay eyes on when you open them in the morning (note to self: do this).

In short, you can get content on an e-reader. Information. Just the facts, ma’am. But as any self-respecting sleuth knows, the facts aren’t enough. Context is everything. If it weren’t, novels could alll be twenty pages long, since that’s about what it takes to convey “just the facts” of a novel’s story.

I bring this all up partly to point out an instance of what I’ve been saying generally in the past: that if “book” comes entirely to mean “e-book,” we’ll lose a lot. Dust jackets, endpapers, typeface, bindings — none of that (and so much more!) will exist anymore. Worse, we won’t be able to get it back on any large scale. Once the most popular books are read mostly on e-readers, all the machinery of print publishing will be too expensive to maintain just for the “special” books. Small presses can take up some slack and even do a better job on the publishing side, often, but the marketing, publicity, and distribution will be just that: smaller. There won’t be a big machine to campaign or do anything else for a book; there won’t be a big machine at all.

A page from House of Leaves

Not only that, some books just won’t get written. Anything that depends for its effect on a look at the whole page — books with lots of typography stunts and/or footnotes, for instance, like Mark Z. Danielewski’s House of Leaves or David Foster Wallace’s Infinite Jest just aren’t the same when you can’t see all the elements at once, or until you scroll down. I’m not suggesting those two authors would’ve been deterred. But if I’m thinking about writing a book that consists for example only of emails, diary entries, phone messages, and newspaper articles (possibly with a few cop car radio transmissions, a threat scrawled in fingerpaint, and a teenager’s text messages thrown in), I can’t help knowing that what that book’s page used to look like is now a thing mostly of the past. That people just didn’t think that sort of detail was important, so now it’s gone. That maybe I should do something else, something e-friendlier, you know?

Nor am I suggesting a boycott of ebooks. That would be futile and silly. I’m just saying (again!) that McLuhan was right, that the medium really is the message, and that since we seem to have chosen the one we want — the electronic one, with all that it implies —  we should at least own up to having chosen, also, what we don’t want. What, that is, we’ve decided to throw out with the paper-and-print bathwater.

There’s a piece in The Nation magazine called “The Amazon Effect” that describes Amazon’s rise from Jeff Bezos’ vision to retail behemoth with special emphasis on the shift to digital books. He says a couple of things in it that have made people mad, but if you can overlook that (I can and do) and if this subject interests you as it does me, you might want to have a look.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in Sarah's Posts, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

James Taylor as a Villian?

Vicki Doudera here, pondering the answer my daughter gave me just moments ago when I asked her what I should write about for this post.

“Blog about the James Taylor concert,” she suggested. That would be Sunday night’s soiree at the Cumberland County Civic Center in Portland. A big contingent of us from Camden-Rockport headed down the coast to see the legendary crooner, meeting first at a friend’s roof deck in the West End for drinks and potluck before walking to the show.

It was a beautiful evening to go up on a roof, whether this old world had started getting you down or not, but truthfully I don’t think we were expecting too much from the concert. After all, many of us — including me — had seen James Taylor several times before, but it had been decades, and we figured that in the intervening years the singer would have lost some of his musical prowess. (While we, ironically, had all gained in talent, of course.)

Instead, he was a steamroller, baby — rolling all over us with the clear, strong tones everyone remembered. The songs were a nice mix of old and new, the venue, much more intimate than you would think, and the crowd appreciative and, in true Maine fashion, friendly. In short, the show was terrific.

But I digress.

Because two days before seeing JT, I stopped in to Rockland’s Salvation Army store and spotted a book from 1986 called Writing the Modern Mystery, by Barbara Norville. I bought it, and have been reading snatches of it now and then. Today, a piece of advice from Chapter 2 (The Realm of Ideas: Sinister Intentions) caught my eye:

You must develop a jaundiced view of other human beings, and look for the worst in them.

Sure, this works perfectly well for street thugs, greedy stockbrokers, or even obnoxious real estate clients, but what about Sweet Baby James? Can we really gaze upon that guileless smiling face, and, instead of smiling ourselves, see… evil?

It’s not easy. Yes, he’s fought his demons in the form of drug and alcohol addictions, divorced a couple of wives, and recorded a few unpopular songs, but those things don’t make him a crook.

Even the sinister photograph at left in which he truly resembles a James Bond Super Villian (Add a weeping “tell” and you’ve got Le Chiffre; photoshop in a cat and – presto – it’s Blofeld!) can’t make me imagine JT as a bad guy.  Can you?

But a gangly superstar musician with a mellow voice dredged up from the depths of my imagination? Now that guy’s pure mean. He might have garrotted a a greedy agent with guitar string, or shoved a too-talented backup singer down a set of steep stairs. He’s a ruthless, heartless, fiend — a product of my creative gray cells, and a villian for sure.

Who doesn’t love this process? Playing God — or, as Barbara Norville describes it, Dr. Frankenstein — is what makes writing fiction such fun.

Who is the most unlikely character you recall being a villian? A babysitter? The minister? A handyman?

A handyman… that makes me think of a song…

 

 

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized, Vicki's Posts | Tagged , , | 12 Comments

An Interview with Katherine Hall Page

Katherine, you’re currently out and about touring your 20th Faith Fairchild mystery, The Body in the Boudoir. This book is actually a “prequel” to the ones we’ve been reading all these years. Can you tell us a little bit about the story?

The 10th book in the series, The Body in the Big Apple was set in 1989 when Faith Sibley was just starting her catering firm in her native Manhattan. Over the years, readers have asked the “what next?” question that we writers ask ourselves all the time and The Body in the Boudoir is the result. It picks up exactly where the other book left off, January 1990. Faith has no intention of getting involved with anyone after an unhappy end to what she thought might be Mr. Right in the previous book. But then she meets Tom Fairchild at a wedding she’s catering. She doesn’t realize the New Englander is in town to perform the ceremony. He’s changed his clothes for the reception. Coup de Foudre and the book rollicks along a very bumpy path to the altar with subplots involving a young Italian student with a big secret working for Faith and Faith’s financial bigwig sister who is unaccountably losing clients. Manhattan is a major player in the story.

We’re in awe of your ability to keep coming up with new plots for these books. So please tell us, where did the idea for this particular story come from?

The readers, as I mentioned, but also because I’m fascinated with New York City, then and now. I grew up in northern New Jersey, a 30-minute bus ride from Port Authority and making the city Faith’s hometown from the start was important to me. The link between character and setting defines a book for me. As for the love story, which is essentially what Boudoir is, I thought it was time to provide the background for the rest of the series. It also seemed necessary to talk about the difficult decision she had to make that so many people do when plighting their troth—moving to a completely different place and giving up a career.

Sometimes we hear that authors get tired of their series characters. It seems like Faith’s character, and her relationship with her family and her friends, just gets richer and deeper with each book. What are your strategies for keeping the characters fresh?

Thank you for that. I think it’s true that as the books went on, I was able to explore each character, especially Faith, in greater depth. What I like about writing a series is that I have a kind of theatrical ensemble cast that appears in each book, but then I add cameo appearances by others. This adds fresh aspects to each book in introducing one-time appearances, but also expands our knowledge of the characters that appear in each book through their interactions with the walk-ons. I also use place, alternating the fictitious town of Aleford, Massachusetts with other locales—Sanpere Island, Maine for example—as a way to keep the series from getting stale.

Do your characters feel like old friends to you? Do you feel like you’re rejoining people you know well when you start a new book?

Absolutely. This is a perfect way to express it and not at all twee. They do feel like people I know and what’s more important, they seem real to my readers.

How do you handle the fact that some readers will be discovering Faith for the first time twenty books in, while others have been reading all along? How much of the backstory do you feel you have to include in a new book?

In a series, each book has to function as a stand alone, so yes, it’s extremely important to include the backstory. The challenge is to word it slightly differently in each. I always include the salient details—displaced Manhattan native, minister’s wife chafing at fishbowl existence, caterer, kids—in the first chapter.

I know that you, like many mystery authors, have a special affection for libraries and librarians. Why is that? What role have libraries played in your life or your writing that makes them so special?

I dedicated The Body in the Sleigh (set in Maine) to librarians in general and some specific ones, starting with the first—Ruth Rockwood—at the library in my hometown. Every week my mother took us to the library to check out books. I’ve gravitated towards libraries ever since and became especially aware of the unique access we have to books and information when I was living in France. Librarians there acted as gatekeepers, not matchmakers. I have tremendous admiration for the role librarians play in guarding our civil liberties. I’ve also depended on uber librarians like Jeanne Bracken, the Lincoln Library’s reference librarian for help with research. On average reference librarians answer more than 8 million questions a week! And there are more public libraries in the US than McDonalds!

In your more recent books, you’ve started including some recipes. Where do your recipes come from? Do you make them up? And what kind of testing goes into ensuring that the recipes will work for your readers?

The recipes are the hardest part of each book as yes, they must be original. Cannot just grab Julia and copy. I want them to be relatively easy, inexpensive, and not require exotic ingredients. And of course, most of all, tasty. I’ve included them in 14 books now, accompanied by an Author’s Note about all sorts of things—my chance to step from behind the curtain. They are at the end of the books as I don’t want them to interrupt the narrative (Faith stumbles across a badly bludgeoned body followed by a brownie recipe). Also some people are not interested in them, which is fine. I include five or more—an appetizer or soup, main dish, usually some kind of bread, and dessert. I test them by making them over and over! Readers were writing to me for recipes, so my editor, Ruth Cavin, suggested I add them. I was afraid I was copying Virginia Rich, but there were several other authors including them and soon the whole culinary crime genre took off.

Have you ever experimented with a recipe that turned out to be a disaster?

I’ve never had a disaster, but I did have a fun experience with one—Aunt Susie’s Cake. I donated the chance to include a recipe in one of my books and the high bidder sent me this family favorite, which Aunt Susie always brought to a Southern Pig Pickin’. I looked at the ingredients—a cake mix, canned fruit, Cool Whip— and wondered how it would taste. It has been one of the most popular recipes I’ve ever put in the books. Try it for yourself!

Aunt Susie’s Cake

1 box good quality yellow cake mix

4 eggs

3/4 cup canola or other vegetable oil

1 (11 ounce) can Mandarin oranges packed in juice

For the frosting:

1 small package instant vanilla pudding

1 large (20 ounce) can crushed pineapple packed in juice

1 large container Cool Whip or other whipped topping

Combine the cake mix, eggs, oil, and oranges (including juice) in a bowl. Mix according to the directions on the box. Pour into 3 round cake pans and bake at 350° for approximately 25 minutes. Remove from the pans and cool on cake racks while you make the frosting.

Drain the pineapple, reserving the juice. Mix the juice and the instant pudding together. Add the Cool Whip and drained pineapple. Mix. Spread some of the frosting between the layers and use the rest on the top and sides of the cake.

Speaking of recipes, along with your mysteries, you also have a cookbook, Have Faith in Your Kitchen. What was it like putting that together? Have your readers been excited about the book? And please, would you be willing to share a recipe with us?

Doing the cookbook was a joy as the publisher, Roger Lathbury of Orchises Press, has been a friend since high school. Besides the paperback for kitchen use, Roger published a collectors hard cover edition, hand sewn in a beautiful slip case (Orchises mostly does this sort of book). There are only a few left! We consulted about fonts, the illustrations—not the ordinary publishing experience. Readers have loved it and now they have all the recipes in one place plus some essays I wrote in between. One reader wrote that all my books in her local library had the recipe sections cut out, so she was thrilled.  This is coals to Newcastle, but here’s my family’s cherished fish chowder recipe:

6-7 1/4” thick slices bacon

3 cups diced yellow onions

5-6 medium potatoes, peeled

1 lb. haddock

1 lb. cod

2 cans (3 cups) evaporated milk

1 cup whole milk

Salt

Freshly ground pepper

 

Fry the bacon, removed from the pan, and place on a paper towel. Sauté the onions in the bacon fat and set the pan aside.

Cut the potatoes in half the long way, then in 1/4” slices. Put them in a nonreactive pot large enough for the chowder. Cover the potatoes with water and boil until tender. Be careful not to put in too much water or the chowder will be soupy. While the potatoes are cooking, cut the fish into generous bite-sized pieces. When the potatoes are ready, add the fish to the pot, cover and simmer until the fish flakes.

When the fish is done, crumble the bacon and add it to the pot along with the onions and any grease in the pan, the evaporated and whole milks. Bring the mixture to a boil, cover, and turn the heat down. Simmer for 5 minutes and add salt and pepper to taste.

Chowder invariably tastes better when made a day ahead.

You may also use salt pork instead of bacon. Two kinds of fish make for a more interesting chowder, but these can be any combination of the following: haddock, cod, Pollack, monkfish, and hake. Finally, there is the question of garnishes: dill, chopped parsley, oyster crackers, butter are all good. My family goes for butter.

One of the reasons we’re excited to have you as one of our interviewees is that you spend a big chunk of every year in Maine yourself. What part of Maine do you call home?

I don’t just call Deer Isle home—it is home. We started going there in 1958 to a nature lodge run by a U Maine retired botanist. My parents bought a small piece of land in 1967 and built a cottage, which my sister now has and we bought the one next door. We are on a beautiful cove. My parents are buried on the island and there’s room for the rest of us. My son has grown up there and if my husband hadn’t loved it when I first took him there in 1974, all bets would have been off. I’m now on the island about 3 months a year and hope to stretch it out in the future.

We love to share our special parts of Maine with our readers. Could you tell us about some of your favorite haunts down your way? Are there great places to eat, to explore, to take a great walk?

Well, we used to love the old Mardens in Ellsworth, but the new one isn’t as good. However, that’s not what you mean. We spend a great deal of time on the water and love the run from Deer Isle to Swan’s Island. On land, I like to go to Cherryfield once a summer and stay at the Englishman’s Bed and Breakfast, continuing on to Schoodic Point. Lily’s Café was the best food on Deer Isle, but Kyra Alex is taking a break. Nothing comes close to the Friday Night Fry at the Harbor Café in Stonington, and their breakfasts, though. Almost forgot Riverside Café in Ellsworth. I also like to go to Northeast Harbor to the gardens there and out to Isle Au Haut for a glimpse of the way Maine used to be. There’s a great guy, Steve Johnson, the Stonington Harbormaster, who is running excursions also—Bert & I Charters—a perfect way to see the area and affordable. And then there’s the Blue Hill Fair (best fries at the King and Queen’s, formerly Thelma the Fry Queen’s but sadly she is gone—same family though). We go every year. And also all the wonderful artists and craftspeople in the area—particularly Blossom Studio and Eggemoggin Textile Studio. Oh, and Haystack Mountain School on Deer Isle and…

What is a question that you’d like to be asked in an interview, and rarely are?

It’s a question I often ask others: “What’s your earliest memory?” Often the answer ties in to what’s significant in a person’s life. For example, my mother, who was an artist, could clearly recall a beaded, multi-colored curtain hanging in a doorway at a cottage on a lake-she would have been two. My first memory is of our car pulling up and my parents getting out with my new baby sister-I was just three. I can even remember the dress my mother was wearing (and no, there isn’t a photo). My family has always been extremely important-immediate one and later husband and son. I’ve also always been interested in other people’s families—especially Faith Fairchild’s.

P.S.

The books set in Maine are: The Body in the Kelp, The Body in the Basement, The Body in the Lighthouse, and The Body in the Sleigh.

Also the Edgar nominated juvenile: Christie & Company Down Eastand several short stories.

Katherine Hall Page’s series features amateur sleuth/caterer, Faith Fairchild. The Body in the Belfry (1991) won an Agatha for Best First; “The Would-Be Widower” (2001) won Best SS ; and The Body in the Snowdrift (2005) won Best Novel when Katherine was Malice XVIII’s Guest of Honor . She has also written for young adults, bringing the total of her books at present to twenty-six.

 

 

 

Posted in Katherine's Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 3 Comments

A Book Begins; Commence the Wandering

Hey all. Gerry Boyle here. And I’m reporting in after spending much of the day in my favorite part of the writing trade: the wandering.

I love the writing itself. I love the long hours in the study with the story. I like seeing the finished book and I like going around talking the book up. But there is something special about the research stage of  a book, when ideas are forming but nothing is decided and anything is possible. This is what I call “the wandering stage” when I set out with notebooks and camera and Gazeteer and go where intuition takes me.

With a book in the hopper and the next one a vague notion, this morning I set out early, taking an SUV just in case. I’m doing research in Jack McMorrow’s backyard, and even after all these years on Jack’s turf in the willwags of Waldo County Maine, I keep the Gazeteer beside me. I drive back roads and then I drive roads that are just dashes on the map. I eased my way down one this morning that had signs directing drivers (of ATVs). I bumped along, glad it hadn’t just rained because the road was clearly the stream bed. I drove and mulled and pulled into logging roads and pondered.

The plot is emerging, like people walking out of a haze.  I sit in the woods, get out and walk. I drive back to paved roads and park. Pickups drive by and everyone waves. They figure anyone out here must be someone they know. If it isn’t, they need a good hard look. I’ll bet I’ll come up in somebody’s dinner conversation tonight:

“Saw this guy in a grey Toyota? Way back in the woods.”

“What was he doing?”

“Hell if I know. Just kinda sitting there.”

“Wasn’t some pervert was he?”

“Waved.”

“Yeah, well.”

Drove a road named somebody’s gulch. Jack will go there. Met a young woman along the way, in a store. She told me her dad makes furniture. Sweet smile. She’ll make the book. Saw a kid on a bike, flailing his way down a big hill. Put the brakes on so he could give me a wave. Norman Rockwell come to life. Got the dead stare from two guys in a Toyota pickup. How can so much be said by no expression at all?

I get asked sometimes where I get my ideas. Now you know. Fifty miles from the study. From a glance. A smile. A back road that ends in a washed out gully. A couple of guys who could be loggers. Or could be coming from a meth lab in the woods. A hundred bucks says there was a firearm in the truck. Fifty says it was loaded.

So is this how all writers start a book? I don’t know. I’ll ask my compatriots in MCW. Hey, guys. How do you set out to write a book?

I just know how these things form for me. I wouldn’t, couldn’t, do it any other way.

Posted in Gerry's Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Beyond For Better or For Worse, But NOT for Lunch . . .

Hi, it’s Kate Flora here, musing on a topic of great concern to me, and perhaps to some of you, as we celebrate another summer. It’s all about how our favorite summer clothes have morphed into mysteriously tiny garments while in storage over the winter. I’d blame the heat, but it was a pretty warm winter.

While some might embrace with great delight the necessity to go shopping and acquire a nifty new wardrobe, while in our hearts secretly wishing that clothes sizing was like a countdown, with the the little gals starting at size 18, and the biggest sizes down there around 1 and 0. Or perhaps blast off? I’m trying to shop on what a writer makes, which means second-hand stores, and I’m a thrifty Yankee who believes that yes, we have our hats and we’re supposed to be “making do.” But making do in too-tight tee-shirts, sausage-casing dresses, and shorts and capris that won’t zip doesn’t do. And for this sad state of affairs, along with confessing to a sorry lack of will-power about getting to the gym, I blame my husband, Ken.

Don’t get me wrong. Ken is a lovely man. He’s attractive and generous and he makes me laugh. My life

Ken at Lake Louise

would be much poorer without him. But I would also be thinner. Because my office is on a balcony that is open to the rest of the house, he is a semi-retired gentleman, and he needs to eat as often as a newborn. (He likes to compare himself to a bird, claiming that birds need to eat their own weight daily. Unless it’s a vole.) But whatever creature it is that the good man resembles, it involves many, many visits to the kitchen every day.

Thus, while I sit, disciplined and hungry, at my keyboard, the house is filled, early in the day, with the devastatingly scrumptious smell of cooking toast and the clink of spoon against cereal bowl. Midmorning, it’s coffee cake and grape juice. Perhaps, then, his head of silvery hair will appear around the edge of my door to inquire if there is anything for lunch. (I don’t fix it. I just give guidance.) Midafternoon will involve a lot of clatter and bang and refrigerator doors opening and closing, as second lunch takes place. Then there will be late afternoon snack and the query, “When is dinner?”

If I’m at home, it will be something healthy–broiled bluefish, low-carb noodles with roasted vegetables, and a salad. Baked chicken with a salad of couscous and roasted squash from Chloe’s Kitchen. If I’m going to be out at fine libraries and bookstores everywhere, it’s meatloaf and Martha Stewart’s mac and cheese, or oven-fried chicken and potato salad. But then, a few hours later, he needs another snack.

Have you ever tried to ignore the person beside you eating pretzels and raisins? At least it’s not cookies, which I cannot resist.

It’s not just the crunching of chips or pretzels, either. It’s the availability. He claims that when he met me, there were two things in my refrigerator: yogurt and lettuce. If I lived alone, it might well still be that way, supplemented by the ingredients of my favorite dinner–bourbon and popcorn. But instead, there are chips and pretzels, coffee cake and ice cream. Several different kinds of bread for the bread-loving man. Mango juice. Grape juice. Bagels and cream cheese. He’s afraid of the vegetable drawer, but the rest of the fridge could feed a family of five for a week.

We talk about diets. He says I need more exercise. I say I need to finish a book. He says exercise. I say that my best diet would be to send him away for a few weeks. He understands that this is not hostility. He goes on eating. He offers me a shopping spree when the ten pounds are lost.

When he contemplated retirement, I thought that I needed to fear for my writing rituals. I had had years of long hours of solitude, and now they were going to be shared by the person who reads the paper and says, “Listen to this?” Who wonders aloud whether its dry enough to mow the lawn. Who would like company on a walk. Who can’t find the spare batteries, lightbulbs, toilet paper, Tums, paper towels or toothpaste. Who thinks it would be a great idea to clean some closets. Right now. Or rearrange the garage, which is full of my books. Or who wants me to look at my calendar, so we can schedule some dinners with our friends.

Dinners? Friends? Walk? My head is full of the scene I am writing, or I’m just working out the careful balance of arranging where 250 pages of interviews will go and trying to learn to use Scrivener. I’m crafting the perfect dialogue. I am giving a hopeful writer advice on a new novel. I have not had breakfast and I’m resisting going downstairs where there is food.

And then I am undone by toast.

I can put on my Bose “husband-canceling” headphones. But what do I do for my nose?

Posted in Kate's Posts | Tagged , , , , | 10 Comments