A Day in Brooklyn by Matt Cost

This past Saturday, my wife, Deb, and I visited my daughter in Brooklyn. There was a night and a morning on either end of the visit, but really it was one day, and the idea was to see how much we could cram into it. But the sojourn was about more than seeing the daughter. It was also about research, as how can one write off a trip if they don’t tie in the writing?

We booked a hotel at the top of Fort Greene, bordering Vinegar Hill, a significant neighborhood setting for the book I’m finishing up. Kings County Gone Amok is the third book in the Brooklyn 8 Ballo series, in which 8 investigates the kidnapping of a young girl that brings him again and again to Vinegar Hill, which was then known as Irish Town.

Bright and early on Saturday, Deb and I struck out for a walk around to get a feel for the place. As we entered Vinegar Hill, we walked down Sands Street, the location of where I’m currently in the big showdown that involves various factions who were historically accurate entities of the time. The Italian Black Hand gang led by Frankie Yale. The Irish White Hand gang led by Pegleg Lonergan. And the Gangster Squad, led by Detective Johnny “Broadway” Broderick. The kidnappers and 8 Ballo are the fictional part of this climactic scene.

Sands Street led right up to the gates of the Brooklyn Naval Yard, still does, and was a place of sin-filled fun in 1925 Brooklyn. At the time, it was nicknamed Hell’s Half Acre. It housed illegal speakeasies, tattoo parlors, brothels, gambling joints, and just about any sort of carnal adventure you might want to engage in, as long as you weren’t afraid of risking your life. The primary creatures crawling through this excess of indulgence were the sailors from the Naval Yard, but many more were drawn to its bestial, animalistic eroticism.

Sands Street at seven on a Saturday morning certainly seemed a bit tamer than that, and now hosts high-rise buildings and small parks. All the same, as I walked down the street, putting myself back to 1925, I could feel the hoots, hollers, and screams of pain, pleasure, excitement, and terror.

We walked up and down Bridge Street, the center of Irishtown back in 1925, trying to place my fictional headquarters for the White Hand Gang and Pegleg Lonergan. I found the building I wanted on Water Street, and was forced to move it to the top of the hill of Bridge Street, melding the location and edifice into the creation of my book, The Five Fingers Club, which is a speakeasy in the basement, a hardware store on the first floor, and the offices up above where Pegleg decided who was going to work that day on the waterfront.

At the bottom of Jay Street, on the edge of the East River, a walking path wove its way between the water and green parks, leading under the Brooklyn Bridge, into DUMBO, and beyond. At this time of day, the sparse traffic consisted of joggers and dog walkers. This beautiful spot, overlooking the Manhattan skyline, was a major reason I imagined why so much of 1920s Irishtown had been torn down and rebuilt into high-rise apartments in 2026 Vinegar Hill, but a significant amount of historical character still remained if you looked close enough.

 

Several of the streets were still cobblestone. There was the old brick building, worn and forlorn-looking, that my mind was able to relocate to Bridge Street to become the Five Fingers Club. The fringes of the neighborhood still possessed either old-world charm or run-down poverty, depending on your mood of the day. The Hudson Avenue Generating Station, built in stages from 1922-1932, is being repurposed from fossil fuels into the Brooklyn Clean Energy Hub.

Next, we headed to Downtown Brooklyn, on the edge of Brooklyn Heights, for brunch with my daughter and her partner. We had a fabulous meal at French Louie’s, which I highly recommend if you ever find yourself in Brooklyn. Then it was off to the Buffalo Parade.

Tatanka Owe Akupi. Return of the Buffalo. Amir Nizar Zuabi created this artistic version of wild buffalo roaming the streets of Brooklyn in partnership with Elders from the Lenape and Lakota Tribes. It started with short talks and songs by these elders that spoke to unity, love, harmony, and peace. Then the buffalo came.

The buffalo were life-size puppets, each with two people inside and several handlers outside, and they came in a herd of fifty. They streamed into Abolitionist Park in Downtown Brooklyn as if they were pounding across the Great Plains, the most amazing puppets I’ve seen since Sesame Street and the Muppets, but even more powerful and realistic.

 

The herd circled the park, then went off down the street, following a marching band with a crowd of thousands following, as they paraded toward Brooklyn Bridge Park, a mile and a half away. We followed for a bit, caught up in the spectacle of it all, but eventually had to peel ourselves away as we had plans to go to the Rockaways for an Oyster Festival and a sailboat ride on Jamaica Bay.

 

The Rockaways, a peninsula of Queens that feels more like a barrier island, was the perfect bookend to a day that started on Sands Street of Vinegar Hill. The name “Rockaway” may have meant “place of sands” in the Munsee language of the Native American Lenape who occupied the area at the time of the arrival of the Europeans, the same Native American tribe whose Elders were speaking at the Tatanka Owe Akupie.

The Oyster Festival was a bit of a letdown as it didn’t compare to those offered in Maine, but a few of those succulent mollusks found their way into our bellies as we listened to an Irish band play. Yes, another tie-in to Kings County Gone Amok (if you happen to be an IRS auditor reading this).

A cloudy (not sunset) sailboat jaunt out into Jamaica Bay followed, taking us through marshlands, across the bay, to the edges of JFK Airport, and back to the Rockaways. I’m not sure if 8 Ballo will find his way to doing any of the Rockaway events, but I’ve been tinkering with incorporating this fascinating getaway spot less than an hour from Manhattan and part of Brooklyn into the Modern-Day Chronicles of Max Creed.

We ended the night with dinner at The Wharf, a bayside restaurant and bar with a band inside that could be heard on the extensive waterside deck. This made me think the Rockaways might be a good venue for 8 Ballo’s next investigation. It turns out it was a booming spot in the 1920s, a summer playground for New York City, and was filled with bootleggers because of the irregular coast. There were many high-speed chases on land and water, making the wheels turn in my head, but I have a few other books to write first.

When being a writer, it is impossible to separate work from play. It is all one and the same.

About the Author

Matt Cost was a history major at Trinity College. He owned a mystery bookstore, a video store, and a gym before serving a ten-year sentence as a junior high school teacher. In 2014, he was released and began writing. And that’s what he does. He writes histories and mysteries.

Cost has published twenty books, mostly in the crime genre, from traditional PI to thriller to historical mystery. His most recent book is the debut of a new series, 1955: A Jazz Jones & January Queen Raleigh Mystery.

Cost now lives in Brunswick, Maine, with his wife, Harper. There are four grown children: Brittany, Pearson, Miranda, and Ryan. Cost now spends his days at the computer, writing.

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Tips for Self-Editing

I had a chance to teach an online class this past weekend for Great Lakes Fiction Writers titled “Working with an Editor & Self-Editing Tips.” It was well-attended and recorded for their membership.

It was a really nice opportunity to think about my process, and how it’s evolved. I just submitted my next manuscript’s final edit to my editor, so I had much to say about that process, but I actually spent most of the time talking about self-editing.

I started by assuring my students that process is personal. That a writer has to find what works for them, and also acknowledge that your process may change depending on length, genre, or nature of the project.

Walter Mosley once said that “your novel is bigger than your head,” by which I’m sure he meant a great many things, but one of the takeaways for me has always been that it’s enormously difficult to wrangle the entire project at once. So, for me, that means multiple editorial passes, each with its own purpose.

I base my process off of the one Allison K. Williams espouses in Seven Drafts: Self-Edit Like a Pro from Blank Page to Book, but have adapted it to the challenges unique to my writing. That’s the evolution of my process. Now having worked with multiple editors and done major rewrites to multiple manuscripts, I know where my writing challenges are.

Nowadays I can get a draft down on paper pretty reliably. It’s not always smooth, not always consistent, and usually pretty ugly. Then the fun begins.

Allison K. William’s Seven Drafts are:

  1. The Vomit Draft (aka, the “Shitty First Draft,” Williams also channels a friend’s kinder epithet, thinking of this draft as grocery shopping and editing as making a meal)
  2. The Story Draft (in which you pay attention to plot and structure)
  3. The Character Draft (in which you refine characters, make their voices consistent, and consider dialogue)
  4. The Technical Draft (what most of us think as editing: POV, sequencing, show don’t tell, pacing, line editing, and word choice)
  5. The Personal Copy Edit (formatting and style)
  6. The Friend Read (beta readers if you have them)
  7. The Editor Read (either on your own nickel or by your press)

I follow most of her model, though I add a few more based on what editors have helped me to see as consistent challenges I have or that I know I undoubtedly have to improve. So, my drafts are:

  1. First Draft
  2. Story Draft (since I write in multiple POVs, this also looks at each narrator’s arc to make sure it is consistent and compelling)
  3. Character Draft (voice is especially important here for me, making each POV unique)
  4. Detail Draft (essentially world-building, a full read through in which I ask in every paragraph, is it clear where we are, when we are, what senses are being activated, what grounds us)
  5. First Technical Draft (looking at chapter, paragraph, and sentence lengths, dialogue vs. narrative)
  6. Emotion Draft (aka Character Draft 2–since I write thrillers, sometimes I can let the plot dominate the characters, so I need to make sure I am expressing how the circumstances and action affect them)
  7. Second Technical Draft (now looking at spelling, grammar, and my “Tic List”–I’ll come back to that)
  8. Read Aloud Draft (I have Word read me the manuscript aloud. Amazing what you catch here, from inconsistent voice to repeated words, to clunky sentences)

It’s not much different from Allison K. Williams’s, but where it is, it’s because it addresses weaknesses in my initial drafts, like details and character emotions.

Probably the least fun part of the process for me is processing the “Tic List.” This is a list of words I know I over utilize or let clog up the prose: but, and, had, that, very, even, etc. The list goes on to over 200 words I try to cull. That pass as part of the Second Technical Draft often removes several thousand words, to my initial surprise!

Then, of course, I do parts of all this over again after I get my editorial line edits! No doubt the process will continue to evolve but it does allow me to, at least in part, make the novel not much bigger than my head.

Always filling in the classics I never got around to. This week I’m diving into John LeCarré’s The Constant Gardener, 2004.

Next up in my TBR is Emily St. John Mandel’s Exit Party, 2026.

Posted in Rob's Posts | 8 Comments

Who is This Jimmy Guy?

Vaughn

Vaughn Hardacker here: As a kid growing up in Maine and later as an adult living near Boston and in Southern New Hampshire, I have been a devout Red Sox fan (with a 12-year sojourn as a Cubs fan while living in the western suburbs of Chicago). Every year, the Boston Red Sox, in conjunction with a Boston sports radio station, conduct a weekend telethon in support of the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. This year marked the 24th year the telethon took place (August 17 & 18, 2026) and raised over $7,300,000 in donations (a new record — the original 1948 telethon raised $231,485.51). All of Boston’s major sports franchises, along with many corporate and individual donors, support the fund. However, I always wondered: Who is this Jimmy? I was surprised to learn that there was NO Jimmy! The name was used to protect the patient’s identity.

Einar in his Boston Braves uniform (left) and Dr. Sidney Farber (right)

Still curious as to who he was, I started doing a bit of research. I was further surprised to learn that the original Jimmy was a boy who grew up and lived within ten miles of me! Jimmy’s real name was Einar Gustafson from New Sweden, Maine. Born Carl Einar Gustafson on a New Sweden potato farm on August 18, 1935. When he was twelve, he felt a pain in his abdomen while walking to school. He had non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the small bowel and had surgery at Cary Memorial Hospital in Caribou. His doctor referred him to Children’s Hospital in Boston. At the time Children’s Hospital had a curate somewhere around thirty percent. At that time, Einar’s doctor was raising money for cancer research with a charitable group of show businesspeople called the Variety Club.

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA

On May 22, 1948, radio (later TV) star Ralph Edwards was broadcasting his show from Children’s Hospital. The broadcast was coast-to-coast and Farber selected Einar. Although the Jimmy Fund has been identified with the Red Sox, Einar was a Boston Braves fan and he longed for a television so he could watch their games. The broadcast was done from Jimmy’s bedside and Boston Braves players made a surprise appearance bringing hats, bats, and a small Braves uniform. Edwards announced that Einar would get a TV if $20,000 was raised. Before the Braves left the hospital, people were already showing up at the door with donations. Dr. Farber suggested the fund drive be called The Jimmy Fund. In its first year, the fund raised the aforementioned $231,485.51 and Einar got an additional bonus the Braves won the National League pennant.

In 1953, the Braves moved from Boston to Milwaukee and the Red Sox adopted the Jimmy Fund. The most fervent advocate for the fund was Ted Williams. Williams later said: “Back in the 1950s, Dr. Farber told me, ‘Ted, we’re gonna find a way to save these kids.’

BOSTON – JULY 9: From left: the original “Jimmy”, Einar Gustafson, Dana Farber president Dr. David Nathan, and Boston Red Sox’s Ted Williams and John Harrington at the Dana Farber Cancer Institute’s Jimmy Fund benefit. (Photo by Stan Grossfeld/The Boston Globe via Getty Images)

For years, many people believed that Jimmy had succumbed from his disease. He did not. He and Farber stayed in contact until Dr. Farber died of heart disease in his office in 1973. After years of anonymity , in Einar’s sister, a resident of Chelmsford, Massachusetts, wrote the Jimmy Fund that her brother was still alive. The fund director dismissed the letter. One fund-raiser took the letter seriously and tried to locate Einar. One day her phone rang and the caller said: “This is Jimmy. I heard you were looking for me.”

Einar had continued receiving chemotherapy in Boston on a regular basis. He grew to be 6’5″ tall, had graduated from Caribou High School (My alma mater, however, for some reason the school had never mentioned him.), he drove trucks, married his high school sweetheart, and raised three daughters. He explained why he’d kept his identity quiet:  “We were taught when we were kids you didn’t talk about those things. You didn’t talk about sickness.”

Jimmy Fund Ted Williams Statue at Fenway Park

In 1999, Ted Williams came to Boston for an All-Star event and he toured the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Williams said the Jimmy Fund was the softest spot in his heart about the New England people.

He heard “Jimmy” was at the clinic, too. “Where’s this Jimmy?” Williams yelled. “I want to meet this Jimmy guy!”

The two men sat in rocking chairs and chatted.

“This is the biggest thrill of my trip, right here,” Williams said.

Einar Gustafson died of a stroke on Jan. 21, 2001, at his home in Caribou. Ted Williams died a year and a half later.

Once again I have to ask: Who says nothing ever happien in Aroostook County.

I would like to thank Leslie Landrigan, her article The Jimmy Fund Survives, Gives Ted Williams A Thrill was invaluable in my research of Jimmy. I found the article via an email from the New England Historical Society. If you’re interested here’s a link to the original article. https://newenglandhistoricalsociety.com/jimmy-fund-jimmy-survives-gives-ted-williams-thrill/

Posted in Uncategorized, Vaughn's Posts | Tagged , , , , , , | 7 Comments

Weekend Update: September 19-20, 2026

Next week at Maine Crime Writers there will be posts by Vaughn Hardacker (Monday), Rob Kelley (Tuesday), Matt Cost (Thursday), and Allison Keeton (Friday).

In the news department, here’s what’s happening with some of us who blog regularly at Maine Crime Writers:

 

 

 

 

An invitation to readers of this blog: Do you have news relating to Maine, Crime, or Writing? We’d love to hear from you. Just comment below to share.

And a reminder: If your library, school, or organization is looking for a speaker, we are often available to talk about the writing process, research, where we get our ideas, and other mysteries of the business, along with the very popular “Making a Mystery” with audience participation, and “Casting Call: How We Staff Our Mysteries.” We also do programs on Zoom. Contact Kate Flora

Posted in Sunday Updates | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

They’re Only Books . . .

Shameless Commerce Division:

Many thanks to the folks who showed for the launch of Hard as a Headstone at Longfellow Books on September 1. Great time, great cake.I’ll be signing books at the South Portland Barnes and Noble on Saturday, September 12 at 1 PM and at The Maine Book & Print Fest at Thompson’s Point the next day at the same time. After that, Gulf of Maine Books in Brunswick hosts a reading/discussion of The Last Altruist and Hard as a Headstone at 4 PM on Saturday, September 19. Hope to see you at any or all of them.

They’re Only Books

The geese are flying into the farm pond at Maxwell’s, which means it is fall. Blessedly. If you’ve been following the saga, you will no doubt be fascinated to learn that we are in the middle of moving house. In fact, on the day this post appears, we will be closing on our old home and officially moving into a cozy apartment with a view of the Portland ship channel.

Any move is disruption maximized, but for a household with two ex-English majors, one of them a writer, the critical point has been what to do with the books. I’d already thrown out the bad poems and the old love letters.

Going from fifteen feet of built-in bookcases and ten freestanding ones, all crammed tight, to a manageable number of volumes has been an exercise in self-reflection and not a little ex post facto masochism. (Why did I need three copies of Early Love and Brook Trout?) A serious winnowing process was required—I never thought I was going to get rid of ALL my books.

This didn’t feel like this was a desert island situation. There will be space for books at the new address. But it felt like a great opportunity to revisit why I was giving certain authors and genres shelf space. I finally decided that the only reasonable way I could narrow the collection was to decide which writers I needed most to have around me. To wit:

  • Donald Hall and Jane Kenyon—for the creative partnership and the poetry
  • Jim Harrison—for the poetry and the hilarious Rabelaisian food writing
  • Thomas McGuane—for the fiction
  • Barry Lopez—for natural history and deep thought
  • John Gierach—for the humor and humanity in fly fishing, and
  • Wendell Berry—for the hope and the anger
    The whole process was about as easy as picking a splinter out of your eye with a pair of kitchen tongs, but I feel reasonably sure I haven’t lost someone important. On the other hand, bookstores still exist and my credit card still has some space, so I doubt I’ve reached any stasis in book ownership. I am interested to know, though.

Who are your can’t-live-without writers?

Version 1.0.0

Posted in Dick's Posts, Uncategorized | 1 Comment

This isn’t about when the cat threw up on the bed, but it could be

Back a little more than 40 years ago, I had just started as a reporter at my second newspaper, the now-defunct Haverhill (Mass.) Gazette. It was a very shallow step up from my first job, at the also now-defunct Biddeford Journal-Tribune. With 19 months of daily newspaper reporting under my belt, I figured I had some capital. I told the boss that I wanted to write a column related to the business coverage that was part of my beat. If I had to cover something boring, I thought, I might as well try to find a way to make it interesting, at least for me.

The boss thought about it and then said, with no enthusiasm, “Sure, as long as you don’t write about the time the cat threw up on the bed.”

At my first newspaper job, the Biddeford Journal-Tribune, in 1983. I’m sure I’m thinking, “One day I’ll write about the time the cat threw up on the bed and they’ll not only thank me for it, they’ll beg for more.”

He was speaking figuratively. I did have a cat, and I’m sure it threw up on my bed at some point, because they all do, but I’m also sure I hadn’t discussed it with my new boss. It’s not like I was going to be writing about the cat throwing up on my bed even if I wanted to, unless there was some Haverhill business angle to it.

It wasn’t about the cat, anyway. The message was: Have something relevant to say.

That was not a problem. Having something to say is something I’ve tried to do no matter what kind of writing I’ve been involved in over the decades since. Who’s the audience? What do they want to know? What can I tell them even if they didn’t know they wanted to know? What do I strongly feel they NEED to know?

At a newspaper, or other type of publication created by someone else, the writer must feed an audience that’s already been formed. Yes, you want to give them something fresh, and maybe lure some new readers, but there’s still a framework required for your writing that’s someone else’s construction.

The “thing to say” is much easier, for me at least, as a mystery fiction writer than it was in journalism or other writing I’ve done for other people. I say what I want, and the audience follows. Or not. I do have a lot to say about things and I don’t expect everyone to be cool with it. I’m happy that enough people are that I sell a few books.

We mystery writers have to grin and bear it once in a while when there’s an implication, or outright to-our-face declaration, that our genre is frivolous or superficial. That we have nothing to say. Sure, some mysteries are like that. So are some books in other genres. On the other hand, mystery writers are delving into the bottomless pit of human behavior. That means they ought to have something to say. [I prefer “mystery fiction” to describe what we do rather than “crime fiction,” a column for another day, but just so you don’t think I’m talking about a genre subset. I am not.]

Mystery fiction books that deal gratuitously with murder and the other topics traditionally found in them, or have no depth, don’t hold my interest as a reader. I know. I know! Some become best-sellers. Of course there’s an audience for books that have nothing to say. Having something to say and selling millions of books are similar the way being able to cook a really tasty meal and owning a super-successful chain of fast-food restaurants are similar. I am not saying that fast-food isn’t tasty and can’t be really good food. I’m not saying best-selling books can’t be really good books or that they don’t have anything to say. My comparison is in the form of the analogy questions on the SATs. I recently learned they got rid of those in 2005, so if you’re 38 or younger and have no idea what I’m talking about, it’s this: It’s not about the food/book or it’s quality, it’s about one type of thing vs. another type of thing. I’ll take it further and add that one thing does not necessarily result in the thing that you might logically think it would.

If tasty books that had something to say were automatic best sellers, then the entire group of Maine Crime Writers would be lounging on the world’s most comfortable patio chairs around a glimmering pool in a tropical, but not too hot or humid, paradise,  toasting each other with D’Amalfi Limoncello Supreme [the world’s most expensive alcohol*], and lighting the tiki torches with rolled-up $100 bills. Wait, why would WE be lighting the tiki torches? Our entourages would be lighting the tiki torches for us as we waved our empty limoncello flutes at them, demanding refills.

*$44 million a bottle. AI says so.

Seriously, though, I can’t imagine writing and not having something to say. It’s part of my writing DNA, not something that sprung out of the 1984 cat throwing up on the bed warning. In fact, I may have been drawn to writing, and reading, mystery fiction for that very reason.

When I pitch my books to potential readers at the kind of events where authors who don’t drink even cheap limoncello often find themselves, I stress that my books are character-based. What is a murder mystery, after all, if it’s not about people making decisions, interacting, and navigating the world around them using their own unique map? How else does a person end up murdered, if not for a decision someone made? How do you explore the “why” without digging deeper into the person? How do you write about people moving through the world, interacting and making decisions, some resulting in death, without a bigger context?

That may sound like it makes for boring books, but if done right, it doesn’t. Knowing your characters, figuring out the themes and the context behind the “why” — both for the major plot point and the little ones — are the keys to a book that keeps readers engaged.

The books I’ve read that have had the most impact on me as a writer, and just as someone who has running streams of thoughts and ideas crashing around in my head, are the ones that don’t stop at plot.

My biggest influce is Dorothy L. Sayers, who I discovered when I was 14. Reluctantly discovered, after my sister won a fight over what we’d watch that night on TV. Her choice: “Murder Must Advertise” on PBS’s Masterpiece Theater. My choice: “The Streets of San Francisco.”

From left, Liz, Becky and Maureen Milliken in 1970 or 1971. The 70s were… not like they’re portrayed on TV. But they made us the creative thinkers that we are.

Like the analogy questions on the SATs, for this scenario to make sense you have to be of a certain age. It was 1975. Real 1975, not one created by Hollywood to amuse today’s younger TV watchers. Picture one TV [black and white, with a broken channel knob, so we had to use a pair of pliers to turn channels]. There was no option to record one of the shows, or stream it later. You watched when it was on, or you didn’t watch at all. Liz won, and my life changed. Changed the same way it had three years earlier when she “accidentally” melted my Bobby Sherman record by placing it on top of a lamp while she was vacuuming. She was 12. I was 11. We had a plastic portable record player in our shared bedroom, and the loss of Bobby Sherman meant I was forced to listen nonstop to Bob Dylan’s “Blonde on Blonde,”which she’d just bought. We painstakingly copied down the lyrics to “Visions of Johanna,” then sat on the floor for hours as the album played, trying to decipher them. When they started including lyrics in record album liner notes, it was a huge win for the Milliken kids. Younger readers may want to find a Boomer or Gen X friend or relative to translate the above sentences.

For whatever reason, I recall the 1970s much more fondly these days than I felt about them at the time. That’s a blog post for another day, too. Except to say that maybe things like sharing one TV,  watching shows you normally wouldn’t because you only get four channels and you don’t feel like finding the pliers, writing down and deciphering song lyrics, and basically having to make our own fun, is likely a foundation for the kinds of things that this blog post is about.

Back to Dorothy L. Sayers.

The 1970s TV version of “Murder Must Advertise” led to me reading the book. Over and over and over. Pictured are Ian Charmicael and Fiona Walker.

I was hooked on Sayers about two seconds into the TV show.  Lord Peter Whimsey goes undercover at an advertising agency to solve a smaller mystery that ends up being murder. Every single thing about it made me want more. I checked the book out of Lithgow Library in Augusta the next day (in my memory), and was off to the races.

Sayers’ books are well-plotted, clever mysteries. That’s not what drew me in so deeply, though. Hers were the first mystery novels I read that were about characters more than the plot. Her books said something. Moments from her books have stuck in my head for decades, and even informed some of my writing. I read all of her books multiple times, but I may not be able to tell you, if you named one now, who the killer was, or the victim. Thematic things, both big and small, though, personal conflict, emotions, sad or poignant moments of drama, are still vivid to me.

Sayers had a lot to say about people — how they’re affected by what’s going on around them in the transforming era between the two world wars. How people interact with each other. How their beliefs and experiences collide with those of others. She did it in a way that makes readers care about her characters. Through that richness, she made readers care about the things she was saying far beyond characters.

The things we say in our books don’t have to be earth-shattering. In fact, if you manage “earth shattering” as a mystery writer, or any kind of writer, I really do hope it’s appreciated enough that you’ve got a bottle of that limoncello in the fridge. The things that I want to tell readers are not so much shattering the earth as maybe lighting up a corner of it. Or dog-earing it enough that it’s noticed.

If you’ve read my books and are wondering what the hell I’m talking about, that’s okay. I try not to hit readers over the head with the things I have to say. My satisfaction comes from saying them, and putting them out there for readers to take from them whatever they are geared to take.

At an author event a couple of years ago, a woman who’d paused to glance at my books answered, “No, I prefer literary fiction,” to my chirpy “Do you like mystery novels?” The sister to five siblings in me wanted to respond “Well, lah di DAH DI DAH DI DAHHHH.” But she seemed like a nice lady, and I’m a grownup in a public-facing moment, so I said, , “I like to believe that any well-written book is literary in its own right.”

Do you like mysteries? Kate Flora and Matt Cost prepare to repeat that questiion for the next three hours at a Brunswick Art Walk.

Right. I did feel kind of pathetic saying it. Like I was trying to weasel my way into a club that I didn’t belong to. Thinking about it more as I sat there with my books, I decided that I had nothing to feel pathetic about. Literary fiction focuses on character and themes. So do my books. Maybe yours, too. Or if you’re a reader, the ones  you like to read. Character and theme aren’t exclusive to non-genre books, they can be — should be — part of any decent mystery novel or any book regardless of genre.

It follows that having something to say in a novel isn’t the exclusive domain of those writers who can draw in readers without using a body and clues. Lack of a dead body and clues, conversly, doesn’t put a book on a loftier plane. I’ve been scoffed at for saying this, but being scoffed at is totally in my wheelhouse, so I’ll say it again: Many books that claim to absolutely not be mystery fiction are secretly just that. They just don’t want to be sigmatized. That’s their problem, not ours.

If you’re wondering what the hell my thing to say is in this post today, as we hit the 2,000-word mark, it’s this: If you’re a writer, figure out what you want to say. Don’t be shy about saying it. You not only have a right, you have an obligation. If you’re a reader, don’t have AI summarize the book for you, then call it good. Don’t speed-read it. [Yet another blog post for another day]. Take the time to focus on and enjoy it. The writer likely has something to say and worked hard to tell you.

After 42 years of thinking about it, I do believe that I even have something to say about the time the cat threw up on the bed. I’ll save it for another blog post.

Come on up, Mom. I’ve left a present on your bed for you.

 

Posted in Maureen's Posts | Tagged , , , | 5 Comments

Those Magical Scraps of Paper

Kate Flora: Whenever I clean out an old purse, empty the tote bag from a conference, or clean out the pockets of an old coat headed for Goodwill, I find little scraps of paper where I’ve written down things I want to remember. I also have a lot of random phrases in the Notes section of my phone.

If I scroll through the notes, I find things like this:

One thing I really like whimsey, like this giant red chicken

The empty channels through the salt marsh look like slick brown eels.

Or this, though I don’t know what it means:

Driving around with skunks

A person is only as strong as their enemies.

“The pain of being from away” was a comment made by a writer who had moved to Maine and felt like an outsider.

And then there are these:

Decadence can’t be rushed.

Rental caskets.

There’s always a farmhouse.

World’s largest marine taxidermist.

Not just any ooze.

Fifty shades over fifty.

Are gummy lobsters really a way to attract readers to my table?

There is the thing a friend said, quite casually, one night at dinner: “Every time I got clam poisoning . . .” And from another friend, “I’ve come terms with the pickles.”

From a talk by James W. Hall:

Hide the word that is the subject of the book in the first paragraph

The experience is both “of course” and “aha!”

I’ve noted weird word sequences like fuzzy logic, fussy logic, fluffy logic

Among my notes there is a page of tee-shirt mottos for writers, including:

I’m a mystery author. I write wrongs.

Major Heroine Dealer

Is “Publishing Business” an oxymoron? There’s a story about this one. After a few years of total nonsupport from my publisher, I put this on a tee shirt and wore it to a conference. Of course, the first person I met was my editor. Luckily, I was carrying books, so they hid the words on my shirt.

I rarely wear tee-shirts with words, but currently love: All Plants are Edible. Some only Once. And the one with a cat holding a bone that reads: I found this humerus.

And of course: Living in Sue Grafton time–where no one ever gets old.

The friend who used “supererogatory” in regular conversation.

There are some I’ll never figure out, like The Lady with the Miles. Or The Scale of Damocles. Or Is it a Storm or an Animal?

As I’ve often noted in my posts, observing the world is an important part of writing. It gives us so much to think about.

 So, dear readers: Do you have a notebook? A stack of index cards? An entire bookshelf full of notebooks? A shoebox full of those little pieces of paper you’ve scribbled on? And will you share some of your notes with us?

Posted in Kate's Posts | 4 Comments

A Dilemma: What to do with Author Copies

Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson here, today mulling over a problem I’ve been trying to ignore for some time—what to do with old author copies that have outlived their purpose.

Updated version of three novels. In storage are 152 paperbacks of the original versions

My first book was published in 1984 and sixty-three others from an assortment of traditional publishers followed up until a few years ago when I stopped writing new novels to focus on reissuing backlist titles and self-publishing a few books that were already written but had not been sold. With each new book, I eagerly accepted as many author copies as my publisher would agree to and usually bought more at an author discount to use for promotion and to sell at events where there was no bookstore to handle sales. I don’t have many copies left of any of my early titles, but along the way, as I began to be published by larger houses, my contracts specified larger and larger numbers of author copies. At the same time, I ended up doing fewer events where I handled sales myself. Books started to accumulate.

Obviously, I wasn’t going to toss extra copies. These were my babies! Besides, it’s painful to throw any book away, even the falling-apart, non-acid-free mass market paperback keepers from my high school days. It was with great sadness that Gone with the Wind was consigned to the trash, even though I doubt I’d ever have reread it.

But I digress.

Nefret, Bala, and Calpurnia checking out the storage bins

Our solution to the overflow of author copies back in the 1990s was to add storage bins to the waste space in a stairwell. Extra copies of the romance novels I wrote back then, plus all of the Face Down series and other titles, soon filled these up, especially after the Bantam Loveswept line was discontinued and the departing editors sent their authors extra cartons of their most recent titles. I don’t know where those would ordinarily have gone, but I ended up with over a hundred copies of That Special Smile and not a clue what to do with most of them. I still have forty-eight of them in storage. I really should take them to the dump, especially since I’ve already revised all my old romance novels and reissued them in omnibus editions.

Just to give you an idea, since I have a list of the location and contents of each box in storage, there are fifty-six in the upper bin, nineteen in the lower, eleven under our bed, eighteen in the closet in the spare room, and forty-two just piled in stacks around the perimeter of that room. The boxes are all sizes, from small ones that hold only three or four books to some too heavy for me to lift. There are also 229 loose copies of current POD titles in my office. I am rapidly running out of space, and I will shortly have a few copies of each of the four-book Diana Spaulding 1888 Mysteries to add to the mix,

Feral helping get the boxes ready to go to reunion

Don’t think I haven’t tried to find homes for my books. I’ve sent boxes of my mysteries to Malice Domestic to use as giveaways, donated every time a charity or a library asks, done giveaways at this blog, tried consignments at a local Maine chain of bookstores (not successful), and even taken freebees to my fiftieth high school reunion. The drawback, of course, is that except for the reunion, when I filled the trunk of my car with books and drove there, the books had to be shipped. Books are heavy, and therefore expensive to send by UPS or USPS. Still, I’d spring for the expense if someplace like The Book Thing of Baltimore, which gives away all the books donated to them, would accept shipments. Unfortunately, they only take books brought to their location in person.

no room for luggage, just boxes of books headed for reunion

So, what am I to do with old author copies, especially the ones that have been rewritten or considerably revised and reissued in new editions? Those aren’t versions I even want anyone to read. I’m steeling myself to dig them out and take them all to the paper recycling bin at the dump, but if anyone reading this can think of an alternate solution, I’d love to hear it. If I do nothing, it will be my heirs (years from now, I hope) who will be stuck with a mountain of books to dispose of.

Kathy Lynn Emerson/Kaitlyn Dunnett has had sixty-four books traditionally published and has self published others. She won the Agatha Award and was an Anthony and Macavity finalist for best mystery nonfiction of 2008 for How to Write Killer Historical Mysteries and was an Agatha Award finalist in 2015 in the best mystery short story category. In 2023 she won the Lea Wait Award for “excellence and achievement” from the Maine Writers and Publishers Alliance. She was the Malice Domestic Guest of Honor in 2014. She is currently working on creating new editions of her backlist titles. Her website is www.KathyLynnEmerson.com.

 

Posted in Kaitlyn's Posts | Tagged , , , | 10 Comments

Weekend Update: September 12-13, 2026

Next week at Maine Crime Writers there will be posts by Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson (Monday), Kate Flora (Tuesday), Maureen Milliken (Thursday), and Dick Cass (Friday).

In the news department, here’s what’s happening with some of us who blog regularly at Maine Crime Writers:

 

 

 

Matt Cost will be signing copies of EveryThing vs Max Creed at Books-A-Million today, Saturday, from 11-1, at the Auburn location. Swing on by and say hi and get a signed book.

 

 

 

Thursday at 7 PM will be the second episode of Pets, Plots, & Poisons with hosts BJ Magnani and me on Big Blend Radio & TV Magazine. Our guest this month is JULE SELBO, who will be sharing insights on the pets in her books, from literature, how she constructs plots, develops characters over a series, and so much more.

Check out the podcast HERE.

 

Now Available from Kathy Lynn Emerson: For the first time in fourteen years, a print edition of the first in the Diana Spaulding 1888 Mysteries, Deadlier than the Pen, is available in paperback. Diana, a columnist for a slightly disreputable daily newspaper, is after a story about the reclusive horror writer calling himself Damon Bathory. She ends up following him from New York City back to his home town of (where else?) Bangor, Maine, during the infamous Blizzard of ’88. And did I mention that someone appears to be trying to kill her? Also available as an e-book. The other three books in the series will be available later this year.

 

Jule Selbo had the most marrrrrrvelous time at Langley-Adams Library in Groveland Massachusetts on Friday!  Nice nice crowd of fun, smart and engaged readers. Thank you Sue, one of the most creative and embracing librarians I’ve met!  We talked about my Dee Rommel Books, my historical fiction books and how to build stories.  6 DAYS, the latest Dee Rommel is getting good “buzz”…“A must read for mystery lovers Selbo skillfully uses the coastal features and independent nature of rural Mainiacs, while weaving a fascinating mystery you just don’t want to put down or have it end!”…“(In 6 DAYS)…a page-turner with a down-to-earth protagonist… Selbo continues her ongoing atmospheric portrait of Maine, a place full of flinty, salt-of-the-earth types who do their jobs, disdain the rich and fashionable, and stoically weather the state’s ever-present fogs and storms. Dee is the epitome of that spirit… strong writing and shrewd insights.”  Kirkus Reviews.

 

 

 

An invitation to readers of this blog: Do you have news relating to Maine, Crime, or Writing? We’d love to hear from you. Just comment below to share.

And a reminder: If your library, school, or organization is looking for a speaker, we are often available to talk about the writing process, research, where we get our ideas, and other mysteries of the business, along with the very popular “Making a Mystery” with audience participation, and “Casting Call: How We Staff Our Mysteries.” We also do programs on Zoom. Contact Kate Flora

Posted in Sunday Updates | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Hope After Terror

On this 25th anniversary of the day that still haunts our world in so many heartbreaking ways, I have no words of my own but offer this poem about hope and heroes written in November, 2001 by Kevin Powell, the acclaimed poet, journalist, filmmaker and civil and human rights activist.

September 11th: A Poem

Might it be, as my mother said to me on this ugly, sinful day,

That the world is on its last go-round?

Hijacked wild birds strip the sky of its innocent morning breath

Steel towers crumple like playing cards on an uneven metal table

Unrehearsed screams we dare not hear leap from windows

Into the open, bottomless palms of God

I cannot stand to watch life reduce

Itself to powdery dust and soot lathering the devil’s inflamed mouth

But I am fixated on the television anyhow:

Is this what slavery was like?

Is this what the holocaust was like?

Is this what famine is like?

Is this what war is like?

Is this how you felt, dear mother, when King and the two Kennedys were killed?

I want to stitch up the sky, deny humans the right to fly

Cry until my tears have washed hatred

From the mildewed underarms of history

And I want to say to the firemen

Ah, yes, the firemen:

Your husband, your father, your brother, your uncle, your friend

Thank you for speeding to the end of

Your time and thank you for showing us that

Courage is a soul so unselfish it would

Scale a collapsing building to liberate a stranger

Even as your blood relatives wonder if you are alive —

From the remains of this madness

I detect a heartbeat called life

From the remains of this madness

I smell an aroma called love

From the remains of this madness

I embrace a body called humanity

From the remains of this madness

I construct a dream called hope

From the remains of this madness

I will ride the wings of the deceased

Into the clouds, scribble their names on the sun

Erect a memorial to the moon, chant the blues

For New York City, then resurrect a world

Where a new-born rose will jut through the broken concrete.

© 2001 Kevin Powell

For more information about Kevin Powell: https://softskull.com/bookauthor/kevin-powell/

Brenda Buchanan sets her novels and short stories in Maine. Her story “Cape Jewell,” appeared in Snakeberry: Best New England Crime Stories 2025. “Crime of Devotion” was included in Murder Most Senior, an anthology released this spring at the Malice Domestic conference and her story “Links in the Chain” will be published in the anthology The Lines We Cross, which will launch at Bouchercon next month.

Posted in Brenda's Posts | Tagged , | 6 Comments