Weekend Update: May 9-10, 2026

Next week at Maine Crime Writers there will be posts by Gabi Stiteler (Monday), John Clark (Tuesday), Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson (Thursday), and Allison Keeton (Friday).

In the news department, here’s what’s happening with some of us who blog regularly at Maine Crime Writers: Vaughn Hardacker’s newest novel, THE WAR WITHIN, is now available in both eBook and POD (UBL –  https://books2read.com/u/3JdaXK )

 

 

 

 

An invitation to readers of this blog: Do you have news relating to Maine, Crime, or Writing? We’d love to hear from you. Just comment below to share.

And a reminder: If your library, school, or organization is looking for a speaker, we are often available to talk about the writing process, research, where we get our ideas, and other mysteries of the business, along with the very popular “Making a Mystery” with audience participation, and “Casting Call: How We Staff Our Mysteries.” We also do programs on Zoom. Contact Kate Flora

 

AND DON’T FORGET! One lucky Maine Crime Writers reader who leaves a comment on the blog this month will win a bundle of books!

Posted in Sunday Updates | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Story Ideas In Everyday Life

Where do you find story ideas? Sometimes I see them develop between the drops during a big rainstorm. I see a couple walking along the boulevard holding an umbrella and laughing, soaked to the bone and eager to get home and take off their clothes to make love.

The white line separating a road opens up a whole new world of possibilities. A hitchhiker traveling across country who gets picked up by a strange man. A truck driver falling asleep and crossing into the opposite lane. A woman who had too much to drink being asked to perform a sobriety test, but she needs to get home to take care of a sick child. A pilot in an emergency situation trying to land his faltering plane on a lone country road.

A man walking down the street and talking to himself gives me lots of ideas. I think about his past when he was a little boy and experienced a traumatic event. The event was so bad that he began to drink and do drugs to ward off his demons. Or he developed a case of schizophrenia after college and tried to self-medicate.

Where do you get your ideas?

I see a couple arguing in the car next to mine and immediately conjure up a scenario whereby the husband cheated on his wife and got caught. She’s threatening to divorce him and he’s doing all he can to make sure she keeps her eyes on the road. He doesn’t want a divorce because he knows his wife will clean him out, but he doesn’t want to stay in the marriage, either. They have three kids and the custody battle would be brutal and expensive. She nearly stops the car and kicks him out, but traffic is too backed-up for that.

A man in a restaurant is arguing with his waiter. Either the food is bad or the service is. The waiter argues that his steak was cooked perfectly and the man disagrees, and wants his money back. The steak cost seventy-five dollars and the man refuses to pay, threatening to leave a terrible review on Yelp if the waiter presses the issue. The owner comes out and tries to make the man happy, arguing with the waiter, but the customer begins to curse out the owner and his restaurant. They go outside and a fight almost breaks out. The cops are called in to settle the situation.

The banana man walks around the street selling bananas, but a few kids steal some bananas from his stack. He shouts at them and drops the bananas, threatening to chase the kids, but then someone else might steal his bananas. So he picks them up and starts hawking them again. An elderly gentleman with a kind heart buys his entire stack, feeling sorry for the man. Then he takes the bananas and hands gives them out to all the homeless people begging for coins.

Where do you find your story?

A would-be magician comes into a shop owners market every day and buys an apple, but before he leaves he makes the shop owner watch one of his silly magic tricks. Sometimes they work and sometimes they don’t. The magician never spends much money in the shop and he takes up much of the owners time with his silly magic tricks. The magician tells him that he’s a retired doctor and the shop owner can tell that the man is lonely and wanting of attention, but the magician is a bit of a narcissist and always needs attention. One day he interrupts the owner during a big sale and insists that the owner and his customer stop what they are doing and watch him perform his trick. And that day he didn’t even buy anything. The owner loses his temper and throws him out.

I guess the point here is that story ideas come from everywhere and anywhere. From observation of daily life to listening in on a conversation at a coffee shop. If you’re a writer, you too can find stories in every aspect of life.

So where do you find yours?

All the best,

Joe

Posted in Uncategorized | 2 Comments

Everything Old Is New Again

By Kait Carson

Have you been following the news about AI developments? Do you use AI in your work? Is AI part of your pantheon of creativity?

My answers are simple. Yes, sort of, and no.

The sort of pertains to my use of ProWritingAid for spelling and comma assistance. I switched schools in the fourth grade, and the change from phonics to rote spelling methods meant no word ever looked properly spelled again. As for commas, I tried. I really tried. ProWritingAid is one hundred percent responsible for my editors retaining their hair.

As for writers who dump their completed manuscripts into Claude or ChatGPT, or any other AI program for a preliminary edit, I can only shake my head in disbelief. These are the same programs that participated in wholesale pirating of published works, copyright notwithstanding. What in heaven’s name makes you think they’re no longer harvesting your words (a/k/a training) simply because they’re being forced to pony up damages? That seems naïve, but your mileage and tolerance limits may vary, and I’ve been told the developmental and line edits are exceptional. They should be. They’ve used outstanding models for their frame of reference.

Nor do I understand why authors would use AI to ‘write’ novels. Part of the joy of being a novelist is manipulating words, crafting them and then polishing them until they shine, holding them to the light and watching the rainbow prism they emit cover your laptop. Publishers are requesting authors affirmatively state if they used AI to produce their manuscripts, but there is no reliable ‘test’ and the system is honor-based. AI may produce technically perfect words and punctuation, but it can’t reproduce nuances or the author’s heart. At least not yet.

Wikipedia license free

As a member of the Baby Boomer generation, my distrust of AI may be traceable to the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey, and HAL the computer. That didn’t end well as I recall, and Keir Dullea was so cute. Not fair. It may also seem that the movie had provided a glimpse into the future.

Last month, The New York Times and other publications carried stories about a new AI model, Mythos. Anthropic, the company responsible for Mythos’ development, paused the rollout citing cybersecurity concerns. Mythos, it seems, is excellent at finding and exploiting software ‘bugs.’ It also seems it’s capable of exploiting these bugs on its own. While the company has paused the rollout, the story left open the possibility that the model might ignore the pause. Interesting concept.

If that’s the case, how can authors, or anyone, protect themselves from the insatiable appetite of AI? In the spirit of everything old becoming new again, we might want to consider taking a page from our past and penning our stories with….pen and ink. Come to think of it, that would also resolve the question of AI as an author. At least until robots learn cursive, followed by pounding away at manual typewriters. Right, not much of a leap. It’s a brave new world, and a scary one.

Posted in Kait's posts | 8 Comments

THE SLIDE I LOVE

 

THE SLIDE I LOVE

Jule Selbo

When the mystery starts to unravel and the  ‘getting to the reasons, the persons, the end’ of the story is within reach this image comes to mind. I am perched on top of the playground slide and now I must push off, wind through the final curves and reach the bottom (hopefully landing on my feet and not awkwardly on my rump in the dirt). It’s an exhilarating  and daunting feeling.

Well, at least for me.

I stop using excuses to avoid my computer – like ‘I have to shop and cook for my family’ or ‘I gotta get a haircut’ or ‘gotta watch the end of this tv show’ or ‘I gotta do research for my brother regarding his trip to the Galapagos’ or ‘I must dust or sweep’ or ‘must search out bread that does go bad, bread that will mold, so I know I’m not eating bad preservatives and other additives’….

When I’ve climbed up the slide and am at the top and the only way down is in front of me, I wake up with a new excitement – I know it’s gonna be tough-going, but at least I know there’s a single exit to where I am going.

For my Dee Rommel thriller series, it usually means a big action sequence. I am wrapping up 6 DAYS (fifth in the series).

Sometimes I wish I was writing a screenplay.  During my years in Hollywood, I was told over and over that the ‘big action sequences’ could be/should be written like this: Crazy action push and pull in (pick location) that includes cars, trucks, planes and ends inside (location) finally with a face to face confrontation…

Of course, I would write it a bit more eloquently and more exciting-ly for the characters of the story – but the specific delineating kicks and slaps and head-on collisions and blood spurting etc. that prose writers need to describe – I didn’t have to write them because the director/producer wouldn’t make fight scene decisions until the exact location was chosen. Then the fight coordinator would design the fight/action sequence in that location and it would be his/hers (writer be damned).

I am being too general here, of course screenwriters suggest culverts and dams breaking and rushing waters or the bad guy getting skewered on a hook in a butcher’s freezer, but again – the precise movements – the kicks and slaps and turns and ducking and blood gushes etc. are not appreciated – or needed.

We novelists don’t have fight coordinators to design our action scenes.  But IMO, we should still keep brevity in mind: It is rarely important if the protagonist or antagonists uses their right hand or left leg or spins to the right or left or sucker punches two inches below the solar plexus or twists a specific elbow (you get it). We can get lost getting TOO specific. Pacing is important. Too many tiny details slow stories and trajectory down. Let the reader fill in a lot of the blanks, they have “a camera going in their heads”. IMO, keep the emotions going, keep the stakes high, know who has the upper hand at what point – and keep it potent, and relatively short.  IMO, action scenes with too many physical turns or trips that go on and on are usually SKIMMED by the reader and if you are (as in IMO, a writer should) using the climax as a final reveal of plot or motivation – don’t get bogged in specifics of body movements in a fight.

I am ready to push off the top the playground slide. It’s the climax, the story is moving towards a huge confrontation. So, I am writing this to remind myself to get to the bottom  – to enjoy the curves of the slide, but to pass through them with some alacrity and continue on at a good pace – and, hopefully,  land on my feet.

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

Adventures in Research

Lucy Zahray, The Poison Lady who educates crime writers

We’re in merry old England this week, so this is a revised version of an earlier post.

Kate Flora: The reading community we write for is an informed and demanding one, so we all have to do research for our books. Because I write police procedurals and about real crime, some of my research tends to be quite dark. I was looking for a reference book on my shelf recently, and scanning the contents reminded me that a stranger, knowing little about me and what I do, might be taken aback by my collection. I’m the person who goes to a library book sale and is delighted to score a criminalistics textbook. I read an article in a recent New Yorker and immediately ordered a book about geographic profiling, only to find that I already have David Canter’s Mapping Murder on my shelf. Every book I write has research files, and I have a file of old New Yorker articles on fascinating subjects like using soil to track where a killer has been.

Tess Garritsen, Lea and Kate perform an “autopsy” on Jerry Healy

Sometimes these books are things I read out of curiosity; sometimes, they related to the actual work I’m doing. For example, when I was working with retired Portland, Maine deputy chief Joe Loughlin on a book about Amy St. Laurent’s murder, Finding Amy, there was trial testimony from a forensic entomologist about the fly larvae found with the buried body. I had recently read M. Lee Goff’s A Fly for the Prosecution, so I had a great reference for helping me illuminate the expert’s testimony. Also very helpful in writing the scenes about the forensic exhumation was an entire notebook about the process put together for me by a police detective down in Delaware. He created it for a fictional mystery that’s never been published, but it was waiting for me when I needed it for a real crime.

Other books on the shelves have come to me through conversations while I’m doing

Chris Roerden, whose book Don’t Murder Your Mystery, is a great one for writers

research. Sometimes I have a conversation with a detective, and order up a book he suggests. That happened when a detective in the Miramichi, New Brunswick police department was walking me through the slides he uses to teach interviewing technique at the police academy. Our conversation led me to Mark McClish’s book, I Know You Are Lying: Detecting Deception Through Statement Analysis. Listening to the small language choices the interviewee makes can be very illuminating, as in the moment when the suspected killer in my true crime, Death Dealer, speaks about his missing wife in the past tense.

Once, after a conversation with a Portland detective about interviewing technique, I ran into my local police chief. He asked what I was working on, and I told him about the detective and some of the things he’d told me. “It’s all flavor of the month,” he said. “I’ll send you a book.” A few hours later, a patrol car stopped and the officer handed me a wonderfully informal, and informative self-published book by a Rochester, NY detective, Lt. Albert Joseph, Jr, called We Get Confessions.

 After reading Gavin DeBecker’s The Gift of Fear, I found myself late one night sitting in a jail up in New Brunswick, waiting to do a ride-along, and discussing the book with another officer. It, and the companion book, Fearless, are great books about trusting instinct and learning to be safe and resilient.

Because I write with, and about cops, in my Joe Burgess police procedural series and in my nonfiction, I have an entire shelf about cops. One of the great books is Mark Baker’s Cops, another Adam Plantinga’s 400 Things Cops Know. Another, not for the faint of heart but worth getting from the library, is Practical Homicide Investigation. (A note about that: when I got it from interlibrary loan, a concerned librarian asked if I really wanted to read it before handing it over.) For anyone interested in police shootings in the cops’ own words, I co-wrote, with retired Deputy Chief Joseph Loughlin the book Shots Fired: The misunderstandings, misconceptions, and myths about police shootings.

There are books about the criminal mind, crime scene investigation, and methods of murder. Sometimes, I carry my enthusiasm too far. Once, while I was cooking for a dinner party, my husband suggested that having a book about plant poisons open on the counter when the guests arrived might not be a good idea. I did end up using poison in An Educated Death. Another time, invited by a library in New Hampshire to talk about “The Dark Side of Crime Writing,” I had happily embarked on a talk about dissection of the liver before I realized that readers might not really to need to know all that goes into making the sausage to enjoy it. I’d learned a lot about the liver during a walk on a Florida beach when we encountered a toxicologist. He was enthusiastic. I ended up using that conversation in my Joe Burgess book Redemption.

I never imagined myself sitting in a restaurant talking about dissection with a medical examiner, but yes, I’ve done that, too.

I wonder—are your bookshelves as dark as mine? What are your go-to books for crime writing? And what are your favorite research stories?

Maine native and recovering attorney Kate Clark Flora writes true crime, strong women, thrillers and suspense, short stories, and police procedurals. Her fascination with people’s bad behavior began in the Maine attorney general’s office chasing deadbeat dads and protecting battered children. In addition to her crime fiction, she’s written two true crimes and a memoir with a retired game warden. Most recently Shots Fired: The Misconceptions, Misunderstandings and Myths About Police-Involved Shootings, co-written with former Portland assistant chief Joseph Loughlin. Flora has been an Edgar, Derringer, Agatha and Anthony finalist and twice won the Maine literary award for crime fiction.

 

Reminder: Each month, someone who leaves a comment on one of our posts will win a bundle of books. You could be our May winner.

 

 

Posted in Kate's Posts | 2 Comments

Weekend Update: May 2-3, 2026

Next week at Maine Crime Writers there will be posts by Kate Flora (Monday), Jule Selbo (Tuesday), Kait Carson (Thursday), and Joe Souza (Friday).

In the news department, here’s what’s happening with some of us who blog regularly at Maine Crime Writers:

 

 

 

 

An invitation to readers of this blog: Do you have news relating to Maine, Crime, or Writing? We’d love to hear from you. Just comment below to share.

And a reminder: If your library, school, or organization is looking for a speaker, we are often available to talk about the writing process, research, where we get our ideas, and other mysteries of the business, along with the very popular “Making a Mystery” with audience participation, and “Casting Call: How We Staff Our Mysteries.” We also do programs on Zoom. Contact Kate Flora

 

AND DON’T FORGET! One lucky Maine Crime Writers reader who leaves a comment on the blog this month will win a bundle of books!

Posted in Sunday Updates | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

The Lost Art of Letter Writing

Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson here. Back in 2017 I wrote a post here at Maine Crime Writers titled “Friends Around the World” about the many pen pals I had as a girl and the fact that letter-writing has gone out of style in this century (if not before). Some things available today promote more communication. Cyberspace provides a connection to friends and strangers alike and e-mail and messaging allow relationships to develop on a more personal level. We can even talk face-to-face using cameras built into PCs, laptops, phones, iPads, and other devices.

Back in the 1950s and early 1960s the options were pretty much limited to talking on the telephone or writing letters. I’m not sure how I acquired my first pen pal, but I know there were pen pal sections in many publications, printing names and addresses of people looking for people to write to in other countries. One of those publications was a comic book I read regularly about a young model named Katy Keene. I wrote to one of the addresses in the pen pal section, possibly in Australia, and in time a letter came back. The person who originally advertised for a pen pal had done so several years earlier and was now quite a bit older than I was but she passed my letter on to a younger friend and I corresponded with that girl for a number of years afterward.

Looking back, memory faulty and the actual letters long gone, I don’t know what I wrote to various pen pals or, for the most part, what they wrote to me. I hope I didn’t inadvertently insult anyone. Certainly there were cultural differences that surprised me. My pen pal in Singapore, Vivien Yeo, wrote to tell me of her marriage . . . at thirteen. It was arranged by her parents. Hannelore Weiss, in Germany, sent me picture postcards . . . of buildings my father knew from first-hand experience had been bombed during World War II. Then there was Sonoko Mitsufuji (I think that’s the correct spelling but I won’t swear to it) from Japan. Her much older brother paid a visit to the U.S. during the time we were corresponding and stayed with us. My father took him to a Rotary Club meeting.

I wish I still had those letters. If any of them sent me photos of themselves, those are long gone too. Sadly, so are most of their names. If I could remember more, given today’s technology, I might be able to reconnect with a few of my pen pals. There was Heather. Was she from Australia or New Zealand? I had a pen pal in each country. There was Carole from Bristol, England. I thought of her the first time I visited Great Britain at age twenty, but by then I’d already forgotten her last name and street address. My pen pal in India was a boy. He asked me to trace my feet and send the tracing to him. Nothing kinky. A few months later he sent me a pair of shoes and I sent back a photo of me wearing them.

In college and after I exchanged regular letters with family, in particular my parents and grandfather. Later we kept in touch with college and Navy friends by exchanging annual Christmas letters. That, too, has gone by the wayside. For one thing, I realized that mine ended up being the same letter with different book titles to reflect the current year’s work. We lead very dull lives.

I love getting newsy letters (or e-mails) but these days I have a hard time thinking of anything to write back. I have one friend who sends e-cards for every possible occasion. I like knowing she’s still around but for some reason receiving these always makes me feel guilty that I don’t do a better job of keeping in touch.

So, a question for those of you reading this: do you still write letters (or e-mails) to friends and/or family, or has that form of communication been replaced by shorter forms like posting on Facebook and Messenger? Inquiring minds want to know.

Kathy Lynn Emerson/Kaitlyn Dunnett has had sixty-four books traditionally published and has self published others. She won the Agatha Award and was an Anthony and Macavity finalist for best mystery nonfiction of 2008 for How to Write Killer Historical Mysteries and was an Agatha Award finalist in 2015 in the best mystery short story category. In 2023 she won the Lea Wait Award for “excellence and achievement” from the Maine Writers and Publishers Alliance. She was the Malice Domestic Guest of Honor in 2014. She is currently working on creating new editions of her backlist titles. Her website is www.KathyLynnEmerson.com.

 

Posted in Kaitlyn's Posts | Tagged , , , , | 4 Comments

Guest Post By Agency Director + Founder of Rosecliff Literary Jessica Berg

Meet our guest poster, Jessica Berg.

Jessica will be attending the Crime Wave this year and teaching two workshops on “Query Letters” and “The Introverted Author’s Guide to Building a Platform.” You can learn more HERE.

Jessica is the founder and agency director of Rosecliff Literary, a boutique agency built on the belief that ambitious writers deserve transparency, strategy, and a seat at the table. She earned her MFA from Spalding University and brings more than a decade of experience to her work with clients.

In addition to her agency role, Jessica serves as a contributing editor for Writer’s Digest, where she writes and consults on topics related to querying, craft, comp titles, and the business of authorship. She teaches globally on query letters, positioning, and sustainable author careers. Jessica serves on the board of the Historical Novel Society and is a chair for the National Women’s Book Association.

She lives online at @jessica__berg, where she talks about querying, writing life, and the realities of publishing with transparency, humor, and a touch of glam. Connect with Rosecliff at @roseclifflit.

Free download: How to Pitch Your Book in 30 Seconds at https://www.jessicaberg.me/the-30-second-book-pitch


5 Things I Wish Every Querying Author Knew

By Jessica Berg, Agency Director + Founder, Rosecliff Literary

Ask anyone who’s been doing it for a while and they’ll be the first to tell you the querying process is unhinged. Writers are expected to understand how to write marketing copy for a manuscript you’ve bled over for years and then send it out into the world.

From my side of the desk, a gentle reminder that agents are overworked humans doing a job that’s largely unpaid. That said, there are five things I see querying authors get wrong (or just not know) over and over again.

01 | The Query Letter is NOT Your Book (And That’s the Point)

A query letter is a marketing document. It is not a summary, a synopsis, or a chapter-by-chapter breakdown. Its only job is to make me desperate to read the first page. That’s it. The query letters I remember most are those that treat the story like a movie trailer and not a Wikipedia entry.

With that in mind, I want to stress that I know your book is more complex than 250 words. I know what your side characters have expansive backstories and your b-plots earn their place on the page. That your themes run deep and that you’ve got a gorgeous twist I won’t see coming.

But the query isn’t the place to prove any of that. All you have to prove is that the core story is compelling and your voice is unmistakable.

No pressure, though.

If you take nothing else from this: please hook me on the character. Hook me on the stakes. Hook me on the voice. Then get out of your own way and let your pages do the rest. Tease. Entice.

Leave me wanting more.

02 Personalization is Hurting You

I see this all the time.

“Dear Jessica, I’m querying you because you represent great books.”

Sorry, but that’s not personalization because every agent represents great books. So what does real personalization look like?

It’s you referencing an article I wrote or an interview I gave. It’s a mention of Larry, Rosecliff’s CEO and my cat. Or even you calling back to a Rosecliff Roundtable where an agent made mention of what they wanted to see and how your project is filling that gap.

The big takeaway here is that the best queries are always thought that feel like the beginning of a conversation and not a cover letter you’re sending to fifty agents at once.

03 Rejection Doesn’t Mean What You Think It Means

Rejections don’t mean your book isn’t good. Rejections don’t mean you should give up on your goals of being a published author. And rejections definitely don’t mean I’m personally passing judgment on your or your narrative.

Rejections do mean that your project isn’t the right fit for me at this time. It means I might have something similar coming from an existing client. It means that the market I have the most expertise in isn’t ready for your project.

It also means that I didn’t love it enough to fight for it in the way I know another agent will. You deserve a champion for your work who is going to go to bat for you in all the ways you need, and if I don’t feel that way with the entirety of my being, then I’m going to make space for someone else who will feel differently.

And trust me, that’s what you want. You need an agent in your corner who is unreasonably
obsessed about your book. You owe it to yourself to keep going until you find the perfect fit.

Querying can take a while. Your favorite authors are the ones who used rejections as data, not as an indicator about their work.

04 Comp Titles Tell Me Things Without You Realizing

Authors ask me about this all the time. “Do I really need comp titles?”

The short answer: yes.

The long answer: comps aren’t a formality! They’re one of the fastest signals I have from you about whether or not you understand your book, the current market, and where your book sits in the market.

Also, please don’t comp to wildly successful books! Using something that’s had or is having a massive moment in the zeitgeist isn’t doing your project any favors. Nor is comping to something published more than 5 years ago because that signals to me you’re not reading in your genre as it exists right now.

The easiest bit of advice here is to read widely. Read currently. Read everything you can in your genre so you know where your book is going to fit on the shelf.

05 You Don’t Realize it, But Every Agent Is Rooting for You

By the nature of experience, the querying process can feel extremely adversarial. Like agents are gatekeepers bent on finding reasons to say no. I’m here to remind you that’s not how most agent operate. It’s the opposite, in fact.

Every time I open a query, there’s a portion of me hoping that this is The One. The debut that’s going to make me forget everything. The one I can’t stop thinking about. The manuscript I’ll still be talking about in ten years. I desperately want to find it because I want to champion it and I’m actively hoping it’s your project that comes across my desk.

I get it. The querying process is tough. It can feel like you’re shouting into the void with very little clarity on how to move forward. I promise you that on the other side of every inbox is a person who got into this industry because we love books. We love stories. And we’re all genuinely hoping you’re the author to surprise us.

Now Get Ready to Query With Confidence

Trust your manuscript. Research your agents. Read your books. And then send your query letter knowing that the only queries that don’t get offers of rep are the ones that never make it out of drafts.


Crimes in the Archives 

Join the Maine Historical Society (MHS) and the Maine Writers & Publishers Alliance (MWPA) for a special pre-conference Crime Wave session with author, historian, and professor Elizabeth DeWolfe at the Brown Research Library. This engaging program explores how writers can use historical and archival sources to enrich their work by uncovering context, detail, and a sense of time and place. Drawing on materials from THE MURDER OF MARY BEAN and her latest research on Maine’s first female undercover detective, DeWolfe will demonstrate practice how writers can pull archival research to support their fiction and nonfiction writing. The session also includes a guided tour of the Brown Research Library and an overview of how to conduct research at MHS with a professional librarian. On 5/29 from 1:00-2:30 at the Brown Research Library (489 Congress Street, Portland ME). More Information HERE.

Posted in Gabi's Posts | 3 Comments

Tuning Up the Senses/Learning to Observe

Kate Flora: Today I’m sharing an exercise I used to do in my writing class. It’s fun one to make yourself do.

Tuning Up the Senses/Learning to Observe/Exploring the language of the senses and observation/Amassing the details to create a sense of place

 Write a series of Three descriptive paragraphs about the same place—a street corner, a busy restaurant, sitting on a beach, plunging into a pool, or even being by yourself on a park bench—in each case writing your description using only ONE of your senses.

For example, for the first paragraph, use only your sense of sight; for the second, use only things you hear; for the third, use only your sense of smell or touch, etc. Dig deep. Be elaborate. Overwrite. Accept the challenge of finding better descriptive words. Remember—this is first draft. You can always edit later.

You may find one of these much harder than the others.  Observe yourself while you do the exercise and notice what feels easy and what feels like a struggle.

Here’s a sample of these sensory exercises combined:

From Michael Pollan, The Botany of Desire:

And that’s just my eyes.  My sense of touch meanwhile presents to my attention a low background drone of shoulder ache, a slight burning sensation in the tip of my right middle finger (where it was cut the other day), and the cool rush of air through my nostrils. Taste? Black tea and bergamot (Earl Gray), slightly briny breakfast residue on tongue (smoked salmon). Soundtrack: Red Hot Chili Peppers in the foreground, backed by heater whoosh on the right, computer cooling fan whoosh on the lower left, mouse clicks, keyboard clatter, creak-crack of those knuckle-like things deep in the neck when I cant my head to one side; and then, outside, a scatter of birdsong, methodical drips on the roof, and the slow sky tear of a propeller plane. Smell: Lemon Pledge mixed with woodsy damp.

 

 

 

Posted in Writing Tip Wednesday | 1 Comment

Making Sure Your Last Edit Is Your Final One

One thing I know about myself is that I’m not a great copy editor. I’ve thought about paying for a copy editor, but right now I’m too far along in my book process to do that, so I have to make sure I’m doing the best job I can.

I’m currently reviewing galleys for my next book, due out in October: Critical State (Olivia Wolfe Book 1). It’s an exciting moment as I start a series that I have already blocked out the next two books for. But before I get ahead of myself, I need this book to get the final edit it deserves.

No cover yet, but this is the image for Critical State on my website for the moment!

I’ve already found a POV shift in a chapter that got a very late edit, so I know for a fact that I need to dig deep here. But I also need to learn new techniques to prevent those kinds of mistakes from making it that far into the process.

Ideally, I’d like to find things like that when I’m still in Scrivener, where I do my initial drafting. As I’ve written about before on this blog, in A Writing Tip Wednesday on reverse outlining, I use Scrivener and separate out each individual scene and tag it with the POV character. That’s where I should have caught that POV shift. But I’d “compiled” the book into Word because I find it easier to line edit in Word. I make myself go through the book in detail then have Word read the book aloud to me (a tedious process that catches a lot). I had done all of that but somehow still missed the POV shift.

The thing about catching these sorts of errors in galleys is that it’s a pain to manually fix them. You are also looking for wholly new kinds of errors, things like weird kerning or widows or orphans that the publisher’s book formatting software might have introduced.

Everyone hates making changes this late in the process–the author and the publisher–but errors still show up. It’s why we add the very direct disclaimer to Advance Reader Copies: this is an uncorrected proof. And yeah, it is definitely uncorrected. I’ll keep plowing ahead and trying to catch all the errors it would kill me to see in the printed paperback after publication. So I need to make sure this last edit is the final one!

Currently reading: The Paladin, David Ignatius, 2020.

Next in my TBR list: John Grisham, The Litigators, 2011

 

 

As Matt Cost posted yesterday, Maine Crime Wave is coming up, with an event at the Maine Historical Society the day of May 29th, a “Noir at the Bar” reading at Belleflower Brewing Company the evening of May 29th then the conference itself on May 30. All the information on tickets for the three events and the amazing team helping to put the conference on are here.

Posted in Rob's Posts | 4 Comments