Is the Self-Sufficient Female Sleuth an Anachronism?

Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson here, today offering another excerpt from my 2008 Agatha-Award-winning non-fiction book, How to Write Killer Historical Mysteries. Unlike most how-to books, mine isn’t just my take on writing. It also includes numerous anecdotes and bits of advice from other published historical mystery writers and touches on several topics that came up over the course 2005-2007 in the Crime Thru Time (CTT) online discussion group.

Were there “liberated women” in past eras? Of course. The difference is that they could not and did not express their feelings in the same way women in the 1960s did. No corset-burnings are recorded in the nineteenth century.

Do your research. Find out what real women did and base what could have happened to your fictional characters on that. Women cannot be placed in roles that were, in that particular time period, exclusively reserved for men. As Lynda S. Robinson points out in her essay, “Women’s Roles in the Ancient Mystery” in Deadly Women, she could not use a woman as her sleuth in Ancient Egypt because although pharaohs did use confidential inquiry agents, these officials were always male.

From the Middle Ages on, however, there are many female detectives in mystery fiction. Some critics say there are too many of them—intrepid, adventurous, independent-minded women who are, they claim, “unrealistic” because they would not have had the freedom, given the restrictions of the society they lived in, to investigate murders. Some call them modern women, even feminists, in costume.

Anne Perry comes in for particular attention in this area, even from critics who admire her work. In The Detective as Historian, Linda J. Holland-Toll labels Charlotte Ellison Pitt, her sister Emily, and their mother “too contemporary,” commenting that “the Ellison women are all rule breakers: why would Perry, who well knows the boundaries of the times, create what to Victorian eyes would have been an unholy trio? The Victorian preoccupation with blood and insanity would seem likelier to dismiss the whole family as mad, rather than accept them in society.”

What this critic overlooks is that most of the sleuthing done by these three women is in secret and behind the scenes. Yes, marriage to a policeman would probably banish most young gentlewomen from polite society, but when Charlotte moves in those circles, it is in borrowed finery that does not betray her current status and usually under the sponsorship of “Aunt Vespasia,” an elderly society matron who has apparently earned the right to do as she likes simply by surviving as long as she has and having money. No one, not even Ms. Holland-Toll, seems to question Vespasia’s believability when she decides to help out with an investigation.

There is, however, no simple way to dispute charges that a female sleuth is too modern in her actions or her outlook. Most of those who make these claims aren’t about to be convinced by the facts. The best you can do is trust your own research. If you’ve based a female sleuth and other fictional female characters on what you have discovered about the real women of the same period, then let your readers know your sources through author’s notes, blogs, speaking engagements, website extras, and any other means at your disposal. You might even make subtle mention of some of your role models in the text.

Paul C. Doherty categorizes the real-life detectives of medieval England as “monks or friars”—like his Athelstan—and “clerks, civil servants, men who attended the schools at Oxford and Cambridge”—like his Hugh Corbett. But Doherty doesn’t stop at enumerating the sort of men who might make good sleuths. For years he has cited two female physicians, Mathilde of Westminster (Edward II’s physician in 1322) and Cecily of Oxford (personal physician of Edward III in the 1330s) as examples of real women who might well have been called upon to investigate a murder. In The Cup of Ghosts, he uses Mathilde as his sleuth.

Rhys Bowen based her character Molly Murphy on her great aunt “who thought herself the equal of any man. Although women in 1900 were still restricted by the mores of society, many of them were attempting to break free of these restrictions. Women’s colleges were turning out young graduates who had learned to trust their own intellect and judgment. Louise Boyd led an expedition to the North Pole in 1910 and the NYPD was already employing real-life female detectives.”

Ask any author of a historical mystery series featuring a strong women and they will tell you that real women of the same era could do and often did many of the same things as the fictional characters in their historical mysteries.

So what can you do to make your historical sleuth stand out? She will need to be unique. Don’t repeat what’s already been done with fictional women in your historical period. Yes, your character can have some of the same traits as other detectives, but she must also have a quality (or a skill) or be in a situation that makes her different.

Aside from working in an unusual profession or craft, a female sleuth can be distinctive because of her circumstances. Give her no choice but to solve the crime and her actions automatically become believable. If she is about to be arrested, or someone she loves is accused of the crime, then she has a strong motivation to solve it herself, even if it means stepping outside the bounds of her usual existence.

Yet another way to make a female sleuth unique while keeping her true to her times is to create conflict in her personal life. Is she an abandoned wife? Does she have an eccentric grandmother to care for? Is she running away from an abusive home life? A heroine hiding a murder she committed in the past has been used in a number of historical mysteries already, so you might want to avoid that one, but there are still plenty of “personal problems” available. Today’s readers—witness the success of Jacqueline Winspear’s Maisie Dobbs series—are frequently as interested in the psychological makeup of the sleuth as they are in her ability to solve mysteries.

original paperback cover from 2008

How to Write Killer Historical Novels: The Art and Adventure of Sleuthing Through the Past (2008) was also a finalist for the Anthony and Macavity awards. Reviewer Marv Lachman, in Deadly Pleasures, called it “the best book about writing mysteries that I have ever read.” It is available in a slightly revised and updated 2022 edition in both e-book and trade paperback formats.

Kathy Lynn Emerson/Kaitlyn Dunnett has had sixty-four books traditionally published and has self published others. She won the Agatha Award and was an Anthony and Macavity finalist for best mystery nonfiction of 2008 for How to Write Killer Historical Mysteries and was an Agatha Award finalist in 2015 in the best mystery short story category. In 2023 she won the Lea Wait Award for “excellence and achievement” from the Maine Writers and Publishers Alliance. She was the Malice Domestic Guest of Honor in 2014. She is currently working on creating new editions of her backlist titles. Her website is www.KathyLynnEmerson.com.

 

Posted in Kaitlyn's Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , | 4 Comments

My Vacation Reading Plan: Part Deux

Last month I wrote about some of the books I’ll be bringing on vacation, when my mornings are spent writing and the rest of each day is a mix of swimming, reading, hiking, reading, eating blueberry pie and reading.

If you missed last month’s post, here’s the link: https://mainecrimewriters.com/2026/06/16/books-im-dying-to-read/

As promised, below are more previews of the books in my stack. Two of my favorite novelists are releasing new books on August 4 and I have both on pre-order.

♦   YOU’LL BE SORRY by Lisa Gardner promises to be another riveting read. I’m not sure she’s ever written a book that doesn’t grab you by the hand and pull you in with relatable characters, non-stop action and plots that are inventive while staying on the right side of the plausibility line. YOU’LL BE SORRY is a standalone about the new owners of a house inhabited three decades ago by a family (parents and four kids) who disappeared, leaving only bloody footprints behind. The home’s new owners think they can breathe new life into the derelict place, unaware they’re blowing on embers still too hot to touch. Set in New Hampshire, in a small town with a new police chief, YOU’LL BE SORRY also features a dog who senses things humans have missed over the past thirty years. This book is going to keep me awake late into the night. I just know it.

Lisa will be one of the co-Guests of Honor (with Joseph Finder) at the New England Crime Bake in November. It’s the 25th anniversary of the annual regional gathering of the New England crime writing community, and among other things, Lisa will be teaching a Master Class called Character Boot Camp on Friday afternoon. FMI and to register go to https://www.crimebake.org/event/2026CrimeBake/summary

♦          ALL WE HIDE by Robyn Gigl is the first in a new series featuring police Lieutenant Lauren Kelly, who’s winding up her detective career at a District Attorney’s office in New Jersey after coming out as transgender. Having been exiled by her bosses to the dreaded cold case unit, Lauren uses her skills and insight to piece together the facts behind the murder of her former high school classmate, trans sex worker Sherry Darling. She also figures out who covered it up, which puts her at tremendous risk.  All of Robyn’s novels (she’s the author of the acclaimed Erin McCabe thrillers) are peopled with marvelous characters. In ALL WE HIDE, they include a Dad with Alzheimer’s, an ex-wife for whom Lauren still has feelings and a daughter as dear to her as life itself. Having read Robyn’s Erin McCabe books more than once, I expect nothing less from this gifted, powerful writer, who I’m lucky to count as a friend.

And BTW, Robyn also will be at Crime Bake in November, where she’ll sit on a panel on “Building and Keeping Tension” with MCW’s own Rob Kelley and David Heska Wanbli Weiden, the author of . . .

♦           WISDOM CORNER, the much anticipated follow up to WINTER COUNTS, which introduced the world to Virgil Wounded Horse, who people on South Dakota’s Rosebud Indian Reservation turn to when the justice system doesn’t deliver. In WISDOM CORNER Virgil is back, still trying to shed his vigilante past. But when his good friend and mentor, venerated healer Jerome Iron Shell is murdered, he gets pulled back into the criminal world on the reservation. In WINTER COUNTS, David showed himself to be a writer unafraid to probe the underlying causes and emotional costs of the violence that propelled the narrative. I expect WISDOM CORNER will showcase this talent again. An enrolled citizen of the Sicangu Lakota nation, David writes with authority and heart.  I cannot wait to read this new book.

As noted above, David also will be at Crime Bake in November, participating in a panel with Robyn Gigl and Rob Kelley.

♦          6 DAYS by Jule Selbo, another MCW colleague, will be out on August 5.  This is the fifth book in an addictive series featuring former cop, now private investigator Dee Rommel, whose serious injury while a member of the Portland PD doesn’t slow her down one bit. Dee is tough, savvy, intuitive, and very funny. So is her boss, Gordy Greer. Their mutual respect anchors Dee when she needs backup, but her courage and willingness to go it alone with bad guys is what keeps me reading. At Crime Bake in November, Jule, who also is an accomplished screenwriter, will be part of a panel called “From Book to Screen” alongside co-Guest of Honor Joe Finder, among others.

♦          HARD AS A HEADSTONE by Richard J. Cass marks the return of Ardmore Theberge, a former Army CID investigator now a meticulous land surveyor who lives by a code that is Maine to its core. In HARD AS A HEADSTONE, Ardmore discovers the body of Janey Nightingale in a cemetery she was fighting to protect from a rapacious corporation seeking to relocate the graves in order to exploit the valuable aquifer beneath the earth. Ardmore made his first appearance in THE LAST ALTRUIST, his first Portland-set novel. If you haven’t read it, you might consider doing so before picking  up HARD AS A HEADSTONE, which will be out on September 1.

Like almost everyone else mentioned in this post, Dick will be at Crime Bake in November, sharing insights about strong protagonists on a panel titled “Main Character Energy.”

♦          THE THINGS WE NEVER SAY by Elizabeth Strout is a must-read for me because I read one of her books each summer while on vacation. It’s a pleasurable rite, like having blueberry pie for breakfast every day.  THE THINGS WE NEVER SAY is not a crime novel, and Elizabeth will not be at Crime Bake, but it’s a book I’m looking forward to because (a) she gets New England 100% and (b) her prose is so beautiful it can summon tears.

This novel is about a high school history teacher in Massachusetts who is moved to excavate his emotional world andconnections with other people. So in one sense, it’s a book about mystery, the hidden truths we hold in our hearts and are hesitant to reveal, even to ourselves.

As I said last month, whatever you do this summer (swim, hike, nap, dance, eat pie) do keep reading, and if you’re inclined to share what’s on your summer reading list, please let us know in the comments section.

Brenda Buchanan sets her novels and short stories in Maine. Her three-book Joe Gale series features a contemporary newspaper reporter with old-school style who covers the courts and crime beat at the fictional Portland Daily Chronicle. Brenda’s short story, “Means, Motive, and Opportunity,” was included in the anthology Bloodroot: Best New England Crime Stories 2021 and received an honorable mention in Best American Mystery and Suspense 2022.  Her story “Cape Jewell,” appeared in Snakeberry: Best New England Crime Stories 2025. “Crime of Devotion” was included in Murder Most Senior, an anthology released this spring at the Malice Domestic conference and her story “Links in the Chain” will be published in the anthology The Lines We Cross, which will launch at Bouchercon this coming October.

Posted in Brenda's Posts | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Weekend Update: July 11-12, 2026

Next week at Maine Crime Writers there will be posts by Brenda Buchanan (Monday), Kaitlyn Dunnett/KathyLynn Emerson (Tuesday), Kate Flora (Thursday), and Maureen Milliken (Friday).

In the news department, here’s what’s happening with some of us who blog regularly at Maine Crime Writers:

 

From Kathy Lynn Emerson: All my e-book titles written as Kathy Lynn Emerson are on sale throughout the month of July at Smashwords. For the complete list, go to https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/Kathy_LynnEmerson

 

 

MATT COST will be having an author conversation with JULE SELBO on Wednesday, July 15th at 6 PM at the Windham Public Library in Windham, Maine. We will talk about writing quirks, book series, and our latest releases. WHAT REALLY UPSETS YOU? GETS YOUR GOAT? We might ask this to get things started.

 

Matt Cost will focus on his novel, EveryThing vs. Max Creed, a modern-day Robin Hood thriller. Jule Selbo will focus on her novel, 6 Days: Freya Cummings hasn’t left her private island for twenty years. When a teenager files a maternity suit against her and mysterious evidence seems damning, Dee Rommel is hired for her first solo gig.

 

Posted in Sunday Updates | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

When the Tank is Empty

 

Facing the day sometimes be like dis.

John Clark: I’ve never had particular difficulty coming up with an idea for a post at MCW…Until this month. I’m in a funk so massive that I could sell off 90% of it and still have more than the average bear. There are many contributors to this unfortunate situation.

Let’s start with the meh factor, when I sit down to write, either nothing comes to mind, or apathy dances naked on the keyboard with a rose in her mouth. Then, there’s the need for ongoing distraction due to the crappy reality we live in. H. Ross Perot was way ahead of his time in 1992 when he coined the phrase ‘giant sucking sound’ regarding where we were headed. Well kiddos, unless you’re living in a condo on the dark side of the moon, you have to admit that our current situation goes well beyond suck.

Then there are physical issues (I am certainly not unique in being afflicted by the slings and arrows that come with age-I’m 78). After 30+ years, I’m grudgingly accustomed to tinnitus, but increasing balance issues, aggravated by clown balloon-like feet (thanks to an anti-hypertension drug), and an energy level that would make a sloth envious, do not make for a great level of creativity.

Am I the only person who thinks the number of drivers who have been infected with Mad Max disease increases daily? Here in Waterville, it seems like there’s an invisible bonus for red light running and lane swerving.

Don’t get me started on cellphones. They’re a modern form of slavery. I shudder at how many shoppers seem to be paralyzed unless Brad or Muffy can instruct them to buy the right size and brand of pickles. Ditto with people in waiting rooms. My pet peeve is how many folks at my Tuesday night AA meeting spend more time sneaking looks at their phones than they do listening to whoever is sharing. The notable exception is Jolly Ollie who uses his to type out on the screen what is being said.

I do remain grateful for some things, notably the level of dark humor which sustains me most days. There are a few others like freshly brewed coffee, a new book to read, and my own brand of dumpster diving. I pick up returnables as well as losing lottery tickets. The money from the returnables goes in our grandkids’ college accounts and I enter the losing lottery tickets online to accumulate points. Every 4000 points nets me another $25 Amazon gift cart which in turn, buys books I read and pass along to the Waterville Public library.

One aspect of writing never flags-that of making out sweepstakes entries. After a dry spell of several months, I’m heating up with some decent wins.

Finally, I am pleased to report that Werb and Nar (remember them from last month?) have discovered the joy of going to grange suppers. Werb is especially happy when Wilma Throckmutton coaxes him to have just one more scrid of her rhubarb pie, while Nar is enamored of Lydia Piffletruffle’s secret coleslaw recipe.

I’ll see myself out.

This is KNOT what I planned to write, but you know, life.

Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Embracing The Suck of a First Draft

Hope everyone had a great 4th. Happy 250th birthday America!

I want to talk about forgiveness. To be exact, forgiving yourself for producing a bad first draft of a novel. Or better stated: Embracing the suck.

After many years of writing novels, I’ve come to terms with the fact that the first draft of a novel is not going to produce The Great Gatsby of War and Peace. And you know what! That’s perfectly okay. It’s part of the process. Expect that it’s going to happen and don’t be afraid of a bad first draft. Because if you’re looking for perfection the first time out, you’re always going to be disappointed.

And you know what else? It’s all in the editing.

Writing the first draft of a novel is hard work. Brutal work, to be honest. That’s why Hemingway said “Write drunk, edit sober.” Facing that blank page day after day pushes you to the brink of creative exhaustion. It’s why I can only write a few hours a day but edit for much longer. Developing a story from nothing might be the hardest thing you will ever do. Don’t believe me. Ask God.

Now I celebrate when I finish a first draft. It’s kind of like finishing a marathon with a lot of steep hills. What’s beautiful about completing one is that now you have a finished story on record. You’ve created the story; now all you have to do is refine it. It’s why I stopped outlining my novels; I view the first draft as both my first draft and a chapter by chapter synopsis.

I just finished a first draft with a crappy ending.

BUT NOW I CAN GET TO THE REAL WORK!

What to expect in my shitty first drafts.

-repetition of themes and facts

-different names for the same characters as I try to wrestle with appropriate titles.

-bad grammar

-spelling errors

-cringeworthy sentences

-different tenses

-problematic timelines

-geographical mistakes.

-horrid dialogue

I could go on and on.

These are just a few of the issues I will have to deal with when going back to edit my novel. But it’s okay. Step back and take a deep breath. You did it. While embarrassing at times, accept all this as part of the process. In fact, embrace the suck while you’re writing that first draft. Because it will get better and better with each successive pass.

Here’s the thing; the real beauty comes from the editing. Characters develop into themselves and reveal their true character. Themes blossom and help generate interesting and relevant subplots. The passive language gets more muscular. Humor and wit blossom in places you would never expect. Dialogue sharpens and characters develop their own unique voice. Endings appear organically. Your mind starts whirring, now freed from the conventions of creating. Before you know it that ugly duckling of a manuscript has turned into a beautiful swan ready to send out.

My advice here is to embrace the suck of writing a bad first manuscript. We all do it. Even the best writers do it. The Pulitzer Prize winners and bestsellers. Just know that you’ll do much better in the rewrite.

Peace out, everyone!

Posted in Uncategorized | 8 Comments

A NOVEL COMING OUT and I’m taking a reading short stories break. What makes a good one for you?

Jule Selbo

JULY 6, 2026

YEAH!   6 DAYS, A Dee Rommel Mystery will be winging its way out into the world SOON!

To take a short break before I move onto 5 DAYS, A Dee Rommel Mystery,  I have been reading a lot of short mystery/crime fiction (less that 10,000 words). Here’s what I am finding that I respond to as a reader and I would love for you to add your thoughts/opinions and “druthers” to this.  I love this form, and it’s all subjective – right? But I wonder where we agree or disagree.

Here’s my list. Can you add or subtract?  I know we all have different preferences.

  1. Characters have to draw me in.
  2. Plot is not enough
    1. Intricate plotting (too much focus on the procedural elements) is not what I respond to.
    2. I get frustrated if the crime or mystery is not foreshadowed or introduced by the second page of a short story. Not sure why.
    3. Character description and backstory hold my attention for only so long, I want to know why I am reading the story. What’s the mystery? What’s the crime?
    4. I admit I am an impatient person but since these are short stories, is it necessary to “get on with it”?
  3. The differences between complicated and complex in the art of storytelling have become clearer to me.
    1. Unbelievable or outrageous machinations of planning and/or executing a crime are not necessary or appreciated by me.
  4. Stakes that are of a personal nature to the main character (s) is (are) a must.
    1. Presenting the crime/mystery more as a puzzle for the reader (and not for the protagonist) is not as attractive to me as being a reader in the passenger seat while the protagonist drives the way to the solve.
      1. This was a bit of a revelation to me. I didn’t know I would have that bias.
  5. Wordsmithing impresses me.
    1. A well-built sentence with a metaphor or simile that surprises or makes me think is appreciated.
    2. Pacing and great word choices? Kudos!
    3. But simplicity and clarity – kudos too.
    4. But my head can be turned (and my heart warmed) by a bit of wordsmithing
  6. Interesting formatting gets good marks if the story remains clear.
    1. Story is revealed through a series of letters? Emails? Texts? Bulletin boards? Graffiti? I take my hat off if it’s pulled off successfully.
  7. Humor? Not necessary it but can add some good flavor.
    1. Sarcasm? Sure.
    2. Personal views of the protagonist or another character that make me smile or agree or disagree – sure.
  8. Horror? Real horror (an evil that can’t be stopped or mitigated) can work well, but for me, that genre should come third in preponderance. I appreciate it if the crime and mystery genres take precedence.
  9. A period piece? I love the addition of that element.
    1. Take me back in time.
    2. Shine a new light.
    3. Get into the heads of people who ventured through different times and politics and societal clutches.
  10. Gravitas? A point to be made? An analogy for a current situation/problem?
    1. All good for me if the story and characters are not at the service of the writer’s opinion or political, religious or social beliefs. The characters and crime/mystery story need to be the main meal and let the gravitas be the gravy.

So excited for 6 DAYS!  Hope you all can read it and let me know!

The FIFTH (5th) book of the Dee Rommel Mystery series!

An ethereal beauty, heiress Freya Cummings hasn’t left her private island in Maine for over twenty years, not since she was thirteen. Her reclusive lifestyle is infamous. When a teenager files a maternity suit against her, and mysterious evidence seems damning, former policewoman and now private investigator, Dee Rommel, is hired. She travels up the coast from Portland to flesh out the truth, and as avenues of investigation are shut down, and New England’s blood banks are hacked, and bodies are found, Dee discovers dark secrets can create dangerous chaos for the families and for her own relationships.

Posted in Uncategorized | 4 Comments

Weekend Update: July 4-5, 2026

Happy 4th of July everyone.

Next week at Maine Crime Writers there will be posts by Jule Selbo (Monday), Joe Souza (Tuesday), Gati Stiteler (Thursday), and John Clark (Friday).

In the news department, here’s what’s happening with some of us who blog regularly at Maine Crime Writers:

From Kathy Lynn Emerson: In case you missed Thursday’s post, The Murder in Colchester Gaol is now available in e-book and trade paperback. Set in England in 1591, it involves murder, witchcraft, exorcism, and religious persecution—all that fun stuff—as Alison Wynter tries to discover the truth about the death of her youngest sister. Spoiler alert: she succeeds against all odds.

 

July for MATT COST. Come say hi. 

 

An invitation to readers of this blog: Do you have news relating to Maine, Crime, or Writing? We’d love to hear from you. Just comment below to share.

And a reminder: If your library, school, or organization is looking for a speaker, we are often available to talk about the writing process, research, where we get our ideas, and other mysteries of the business, along with the very popular “Making a Mystery” with audience participation, and “Casting Call: How We Staff Our Mysteries.” We also do programs on Zoom. Contact Kate Flora

Posted in Sunday Updates | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Happy Fifteenth Birthday to Us

It was in July, 2011, that a group of us first gathered under the Maine Crime Writers banner to talk about all things Maine and all things mystery. The membership has changed over the years, but the goal, and the pleasure of being part of a supportive writing community has not. Here’s a conversation we had back in the beginning about crime writers and research. The members writing in this conversation are: Kate Flora, Sarah Graves, Gerry Boyle, James Hayman , Barbara Ross, Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson, Vicki Doudera, and Paul Doiron.

Kate: Before I started writing, I used to think that writers sat at their desks and made it up. But writing crime novels often forces us out into the “real world” for research. Sometimes that research takes us strange places or puts us into interesting circumstances. As an example, a few years ago, to better understand the Portland, Maine police officers in my Joe Burgess books, I took a citizen’s police academy. On the night that we got to play cops, and our instructors got to be the bad guys, I was doing a mock-traffic stop. Getting out of my cruiser in front of the whole class, I caught my nightstick on the door handle, tipped forward, and smashed my nose into the window. Red-faced and smarting, I walked up the window of the car I’d stopped, asked the driver for his license and registration, and he laughed. “Look at that little girl cop,” he said. “Isn’t she cute?” I was instantly in the shoes of a real rookie cop.

Sarah: A lot of the time, I do sit at my desk and make it up. But when I’m not doing that, I’m often doing some old-house repair chore that naturally also goes straight into what I’m writing. Depending on whether or not I know how to do the job I’m attempting, hilarity may or may not ensue. Starting out trying to install a new faucet handle, for instance, once ended with my having to call a plumber and an electrician on a Sunday afternoon. (This is an old house, remember; touch one thing and half a dozen others go down like dominoes.) And although the experience was embarrassing, it did double duty in the research department, teaching me: (1) why you never start a plumbing repair, however simple, on a Sunday afternoon, and (2) how kind Eastport people can be to newcomers.

Gerry: I always start writing before I know what I think I need to know because if I waited until the research was complete, I’d never write the book. I learned long ago that research is endless and deadlines are not so I learn enough to launch myself into the subject and book and then pause every few chapters when I hit a gap in my knowledge. Then I can ask myself: do I need to know the minute details of whatever is going on? Or should I push on and not let the pace of the book flag, the narrative meander while I explain? I have a saying when it comes to writing fiction: A lot of knowledge is a dangerous thing. As a former and now-sometimes journalist I know that reportage is an important part of being a crime novelist. But it’s just as important not to show readers everything you know. Hold some of that research close to your vest.

Jim: I do a fair amount of research mostly during the writing process. One of my favorite research stories started with the fact that the body of the victim in The Chill of Night was found frozen solid in the trunk of her BMW on the Portland Fish Pier. “How,” I asked myself, “do you autopsy a frozen corpse.” Naturally I Googled “Autopsy Frozen Corpse.” Over one million hits. The best was an article titled “How Do You Autopsy a Frozen Corpse” that was written by a forensic pathologist in Charleston, SC. The article was not available online but her email was. She was kind enough to send me the article and agreed to become a regular research resource online. I’ve probably asked her over a hundred autopsy-related questions since.

Barb: Wow, Jim. That is a great story. I was on the phone with an oncologist this winter and I said, “I need some kind of cancer that women get, that if symptoms are ignored can kill you in a matter of months.” So he made a suggestion and went over it in detail to make sure I understood it and I’m asking–What would the symptoms be? How might you end up in the emergency room? How long would the tests take to determine someone has this? Finally it got to me and I let out sort of a nervous giggle and said, “This is a ghoulish conversation.” “All in a day’s work to me,” he said and kept right on going.

Kate: Barb & Jim…I think we should wear little “Be Careful What You Say” buttons when we’re out in public. When I was working on my fourth Thea Kozak mystery, An Educated Death, involving a student death at a private school, I found myself at a Harvard reunion lunch with the Principal of Exeter. I borrowed some paper from our hostess, sat down, and proceeded to ask her a zillion questions about how they’d handle an unexplained student death. She went through the list–counselors, reassurance, bringing the student body together, making faculty and advisers available. And food, she said. Put food wherever they will congregate. It will be comforting. At the same party, I found an ER doc and, like you, Barb, started asking about the physical effects of wild hemlock poisoning. I left with a list of symptoms, including pulmonary edema and hallucinations. “She will be breathing air, and it will feel like she is drowning.”

Kaitlyn: One of the things I love about writing contemporary mysteries (as opposed to the historicals I’ve done as Kathy Lynn Emerson) is that there is so much less to research. Not only am I writing about, literally, my own back yard, with the fictional Carrabassett County tucked in between Franklin County (where I live) and Oxford County, but I have an in-house expert to ask questions of, my retired deputy sheriff/probation officer husband. Example: In A Wee Christmas Homicide, which involves smuggling items from Canada into Maine, I needed to know how easy it would be to slip across the border. I knew there was no fence, and that border crossings were few and far between, but I had a sneaking suspicion there was something to deter “alien” invasions. The in-house expert had the answer. Trees are clear-cut on both sides to mark the line between Maine and Quebec in northern Franklin County. At first I wasn’t too happy, since I needed to sneak a snowmobile across, but in the end that detail ended up adding a whole new dimension to a crucial scene.

Vicki: Are the rest of you ever worried that if someone searched our computers’ histories they’d think we were responsible for a whole host of heinous crimes? I know that I spent a heck of a lot of time researching multiple stab wounds (along with wicked mojito recipes) for KILLER LISTING…

Kate: I know that I was about to hook up with a bomb expert to learn how to blow up the Portsmouth Bridge (fictitiously, of course), but then 9/11 happened and I felt I had to tone it down. But yes…I’m sure that if anyone searched our computers (or hacked our phones?) we’d been in deep trouble. BTW, are you going to share those mojito recipes or do we have to read the book?

Kaitlyn: I don’t have any bomb stories, but I have used poisons a fair bit in my historical mysteries. In fact, since the Moxie Festival in Lisbon Falls is this weekend, I am reminded that I once used our infamous official state soft drink (which you either love or hate) to hide the taste of a near-lethal dose of morphine. This relates to our research topic because this scene is in Lethal Legend (w/a Kathy Lynn Emerson), which is set on an island off the coast of Maine in 1888. I had to do some digging to find out how Moxie was packaged back in the days when it was considered a cure for all kinds of ailments, and also to discover how difficult it would have been to get hold of opium and morphine. As it turned out, both were alarmingly easy to buy in the late nineteenth century.

Paul: I have a familiar hobbyhorse that I ride from time to time whenever I get asked to be on a conference panel. Thorough research is absolutely indispensable, and the last thing I want as a writer is to ruin a reader’s experience by including some stupid error in a book that breaks the suspension of disbelief. But I read too many crime novels where the author is trying so hard to be “factual” (“and then I pulled up Form 5D on the department’s antique Dell laptop”) that my eyes start to roll. Wasn’t it Hitchcock who said that “drama is life with all the boring parts cut out?” Personally, I find lots of crime novels overflowing with boring parts. Knowing what to leave out is another way of establishing your authority as a storyteller. I guess I am echoing Gerry here.

Kate: And Elmore Leonard reminds us to leave out the parts that people skip.

Posted in Uncategorized | 6 Comments

And It’s Out in the World (at last!)

Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson here, today posting as Kathy. As regular readers of this blog know, I’ve spent the last six months doing a total rewrite of a novel previously published in 2020. I’m pleased to announce that its release date was June 30, so it has been out in the world in e-book and print-on-demand formats for a whole two days. As usual, since I am retired and no longer travel well, I am not doing signings or mailings or most of the other promotional things writers are supposed to do. This post and announcements in the Weekend Update and on Facebook and Bluesky are pretty much it. Word-of-mouth and reader reviews are, of course, much appreciated. That doesn’t mean I think any less of the work that went into producing this novel, only that my goal is no longer to support myself with my writing but only to make what I’ve written available to anyone who might want to read it.

So, what is this book?  The Murder in Colchester Gaol began life as Murder in Colchester Gaol, a proposal for the third of four Mistress Jaffrey Mysteries. Unfortunately, and despite the fact that I had already written a draft of that book, the publisher preferred the plot I had suggested for Book Four. Rather than end the series at two novels, I set aside my manuscript and wrote Murder in a Cornish Alehouse, which was published as the third and last Mistress Jaffrey Mystery.

Colchester Castle

For Book Four to become Book Three, the chronology of events had to change, which meant that even if I later published it independently, the events in the original Book Three would no longer fit into Rosamond Jaffrey’s timeline. It didn’t take me long to decide on an alternate plan: revise the novel with new characters but keep much of the plot intact.

In between other projects, I did a complete rewrite. The result was published in 2020 as The Finder of Lost Things by a fledgling small press. Unfortunately, for a variety of reasons, including its launch during the Covid shutdown, the venture was not a success. The book received only one review in a review journal and sold fewer than 200 copies in the five years it was under contract.

After rights reverted to me I intended to do a quick review and reissue the title independently. Instead I ended up doing a total rewrite. Once again I changed character names. I also altered some of the motivations and interactions between characters as better ideas presented themselves. I am convinced the result is much improved, but if you happened to have read the earlier version, you probably won’t want to bother with this one. The general plot is unchanged.

I’ve given some consideration to producing an omnibus edition that would include all three versions—a study aimed at folks who like learning how writers work. I’ll have to reread the one featuring Rosamond Jaffrey (with a supporting role played by Lady Appleton, the sleuth in my Face Down series) before I decide. That version definitely wasn’t fully polished, but perhaps that’s what a fledgling writer or an interested reader would enjoy seeing. Feel free to express an opinion.

Getting back to The Murder in Colchester Gaol, the story is set in London and Essex in 1591 and the plot revolves around Alison Wynter’s efforts to discover if her youngest sister, Sybilla Palmer, was murdered while a prisoner in Colchester gaol. Sybilla was incarcerated there for the crime of hearing Mass and Alison is certain one of the other Catholic women arrested with her must have killed her. Discovering that person’s identity is no simple matter. To find out the truth, Alison contrives to have herself placed in prison with her suspects and pretends to be a new convert to Catholicism, but when Queen Elizabeth pardons all recusant women, Alison is also released. Unwilling to abandon her quest, she manages to be invited to Otley Manor, where Sybilla was living before her arrest.

Notorious Essex witch Elizabeth Lowys

This was a time of religious turmoil, when anyone who did not conform to the Church of England was suspected of being a traitor. Alison initially believes that Sybilla was killed because she changed her mind about converting and someone feared she would betray the Catholic priest who regularly said Mass at Otley Manor. She soon learns that matters are much more complex. She believed her sister had run away with and planned to marry Lady Otley’s brother, but Sybilla was serving as that gentlewoman’s companion, not a future sister-in-law. Worse, a short time before the arrest, Sybilla was accused of being bewitched, and then of being possessed by a demon and was forced to undergo an exorcism. Once she hears that, the priest who performed it and Sybilla’s lover become Alison’s prime suspects.

That’s the short synopsis. There’s a lot more going on. Living in the household at Otley Manor, Alison comes to realize that there are not as many religious differences between Catholics and Anglicans as she had supposed, and that not all Jesuit priests are plotting the overthrow of the queen. She becomes involved in the troubles of one of the maidservants. And just when she feels she is getting close to finding the answers to her questions, she herself is accused of witchcraft and ends up back to Colchester gaol.

Did I mention she has two older sisters who approved her scheme to investigate but grow concerned when their plan to retrieve her from gaol is thwarted by the queen’s pardon? She also has a husband, a wealthy merchant who is conveniently away on a trading voyage . . .  or is he?

I did not have to do new research for this rewrite, but I did plenty for the earlier versions. Colchester Castle is a real place and was used as a prison in the sixteenth century, although the cells on display in the castle’s museum date from a much later period and the exact appearance of the prison in 1591 is not documented except to report that the walls were in dire need of repair. As far as I know, neither recusants nor witches were imprisoned in Colchester gaol. Essex, however, was notorious for its witch trials and the cases my characters mention are real. Numerous books on Tudor crime, trials, law enforcement, prisons, witchcraft, and exorcisms provided details I used for fictional purposes.

This book is a bit darker than most of my mysteries, but I guarantee it has a happy ending with all the loose ends neatly tied up. The e-book (ISBN 979-8-235-56015-4) is reasonably priced at $5.99 while the trade paperback is as inexpensive as I can make it at $15.99 (ISBN 979-8-235-68466-1). Since I publish through Draft2Digital, both versions are widely available online, including through Bookshop.org, a website that assures the profit will go to the independent bookstore of your choice.

Kathy Lynn Emerson/Kaitlyn Dunnett has had sixty-four books traditionally published and has self published others. She won the Agatha Award and was an Anthony and Macavity finalist for best mystery nonfiction of 2008 for How to Write Killer Historical Mysteries and was an Agatha Award finalist in 2015 in the best mystery short story category. In 2023 she won the Lea Wait Award for “excellence and achievement” from the Maine Writers and Publishers Alliance. She was the Malice Domestic Guest of Honor in 2014. She is currently working on creating new editions of her backlist titles. Her website is www.KathyLynnEmerson.com.

 

Posted in Kaitlyn's Posts | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

We’re Celebrating the 4th of July

Today we thought we’d share some of our July 4th traditions, photos, memories, etc. We’d love it if our readers would share some of theirs as well. Hopefully, it will finally be full summer and we can put away our fleeces and not gravitate toward the grill like it’s a fire pit.

Kate Flora: My mother loved picnics, so we always had a picnic by the lake for the 4th. Swim in the lake. Eat all the great food everyone had brought. Loll in the sun on the hillside. Prowl for late wild strawberries or early blueberries in the grass. Now we’ve reinstituted the tradition on Bailey Island, where new generations are joining us. Here are some photos.

Gathering on the dock

Jule Selbo here:  The 4th in Fargo, North Dakota for a young teen? Memories are of deep emerald green grass, soft breeze off the lake (well this was Minnesota, 45 minutes from my home in Fargo, a cabin my parents bought for basically the price of a Jimmy Choo slingback or a Christian Louboutin men’s loafer today that I actually think of more as my home than Fargo, even though it wasn’t winterized and could only be used three (if that) months a year), my dad and brothers heading across the street to play golf, the sunfish we caught off the dock already cleaned and flash-fried and eaten for breakfast, my dad and brothers heading across the street to play golf, me with a book on the dock, my sister sunbathing, my mother smoking cigarettes with the neighbor and talking about getting the hangar steaks marinated and the adding bacon to the brown beans before baking them. I became an annoying stickler early on for “real whipped cream and homemade biscuits for strawberry shortcake”, so that was on my to-do list because most others would have been fine with store-bought and Ready-Whip. Friends came over, we played croquet, and dodgeball, and swam.  I don’t remember liking the holiday at all, too many people and too many martinis for the adults. But of course, now the memory makes me feel lonely, and wishing I could get back those idyllic days and give myself permission to enjoy them.

Kait Carson: So many memories of 4th of Julys in New Jersey. The smells of popcorn (JiffyPop on the grill), grilled hot dogs and hamburgers, the scratchiness of the wool picnic blanket, and the smell and sounds of fireworks exploding across the river. We were lucky that the fireworks were the only explosions. Somewhere along the way, someone figured out sending fireworks up that close to fuel storage tanks might not be the best idea and the fireworks were moved to a high school football stadium in a nearby town. Didn’t matter, we still picnicked and barbecued, and laid out on that blanket!

Happy 250th USA.

Fourth of July 2006 Wallagrass, ME

Matt Cost: The Fourth of July, to me, is based on the notion that ALL people are created equal. That is the fundamental piece of the Declaration of Independence and the part that has held up, and will hold up, for eternity. As a former social studies teacher, delving into the creation of this historic document is so much more than the paper it is written on, and it is much more significant than the 13 colonies breaking away from England. The Fourth of July is an idea that, at the core, we are all the same. We breathe, live, and love.

John Clark: The Thomaston 4th parade was a staple when our daughters were young. Then it was back to Sennebec Hill Farm for the family picnic. Alas, times have changed and yesterday I experienced sticker shock when I passed a bin of watermelons that were $12.50 each.

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment