The question isn’t ‘Is it original?’, but ‘Is it yours?’

An article in the newspaper the other day gave me that uncomfortable feeling a lot of authors get at least once in a while — there’s my story (kind of) and now no one is going to think my book is original. It was followed, fortunately, by a good does of “get over yourself.” Not just because the book has been languishing for years without being finished, but because it shouldn’t matter to a writer if a real-life situation is similar to one in a book. It’s the book itself that matters.

In grade school, Sister Catherine used to tell us, in her smug, superior way, “Shakespeare was not one bit original.” It was meant to shock us and disabuse us of the silly notion that even the greatest of the greats could pull a story out of thin air. Every writer, Sister Catherine pounded into us (literally as well as figuratively), gets their ideas from somewhere. As a 12-year-old, it bothered me. Since Sister Catherine’s motives were usually rooted in making us miserable, it was probably meant to.

More than 50 years later, as a published writer (take THAT Sister Catherine!), I not only am not bothered by the notion of ideas “not being original,” I embrace it.

I spent more than 35 years in the newspaper business. Obviously a lot of that is going to inform my writing. I’d be a fool to deny it. More importantly, though, all writers draw from the world around them and their experience, in both big and small ways. It’s what they do with that information and how they make the stories their own that matters.

A friend a while back told me that she went to an author talk at which an audience member asked if the book was based on a very similar real-life incident. The author denied that it was. My thought was, why deny it? Maybe the author believed that it diminished their writing to admit it. Who knows? I wasn’t there. I have had the expereience of audience members wanting to know how much of my writing is “from” my newspaper career. The answer is, a lot. Some of it frames plots, but most of it helps with the details, the little things, that give the book some texture. When someone expresses disappointment — one guy once said something like “Doesn’t that make you a chronicaller rather than a writer?” How do you even answer that? I said “NO.”

It would be virtually impossible to write a book where it was all totally from the writer’s imagination and nowhere else. How could that even happen? Imagination is sparked by what we see and experience. We take it a step, or many steps, farther, asking “What if?”

Once, years ago, I was driving to work and stopped at a red light, saw a little boy standing on the corner waiting for the light to change. He was dressed up, holding a box of cupcakes, and crying. By the time I got to work 10 minutes later, I had a whole story in my head. That story, sadly, is no longer in my head or anywhere else, but I still remember the moment, because it’s a great example of how a writer’s mind works. We see something, big or small, and it blooms. [By the way, if you’re that little boy, drop me a line and tell me what was going on. It would’ve been 1995-97, corner of Hanover and Maple streets in Manchester, N.H. Thanks!]

When I first started writing fiction, I wasn’t so much concerned about pulling things from real life and being judged about it as I was other books having similar things. While they’re different issues, they come from the same root — “stealing” ideas from real life, or from someone else. What’s original and what isn’t? What can be considered “writing” and what won’t be?

With more than a decade and four finished books, two unfinished, and countiless ideas for more, I don’t worry about that stuff. It can’t be avoided. Or it can be, or should be, depending on what it is. Over the years, I’ve devised categories to look at these things as a way of reviewing and revising my writing.

Here are the most major and general of these categories. These aren’t “rules” or judgments, they’re my opinion and a way to help me write what I feel are better books. Your opinion may be different. That’s okay!

It’s a trope, but it’s fine. There are some tropes that are just going to happen, and they actually make for good stories. That’s one reason they keep happening. One common one is the protagonist returning to the small town where the grew up, or where they first worked. They’re older and wiser, maybe with a backstory that was a big bump in the road for them, and kind of a fish out of water. I’ve done it. You may have done it, too. It’s a great way to frame a story and no one seems tired of it yet. There are other ones, too, that just work. They’re a thin frame for a more robust story, and when done right, they just glide through the story without drawing attention to their tropiness.

It’s a trope, and there’s got to be something better. There are other tropes that can be cycled out for something better. I could name a bunch, but let’s just leave it at you know it when you read it. Your reading brain goes, “Ugh, not this character/situation/whatever again. I know how this arc is going to go.” One benefit to recognizing these as a writer is that when you brainstorm with yourself about how to rework it, your plot and themes expand in ways you may ot have expected.

Pulled from the same headlines. There are situations in the world we want to say things about. We’re not alone. A lot of other writers do, too. The important questions to ask as a writer, though, are what am I saying and how am I saying this? Or am I just including this type of crime/situation/person because it’s a big thing right now? It’s important for better writing to make sure it’s not gratuitous or just an easy fall-back, or boring for readers who have seen it all before.

Pulled from a headline no one has read. The flipside of that is drawing from something in real life that readers (or a publisher or editor) can’t get their head around. The fact that it really happened may not be enough to sell it. Your writing has to do some work, too. Once example is a manuscript critique I underwent while writing my first book. The bestselling author doing the critique read the first chapter and found it laughable that a police chief would be at the scene where a body was found in a snowbank. I’d worked for daily newspapers in Maine, Massachusetts and New Hampshire for years by then and could assure the world that, yes, small-town police chiefs show up at all sorts of things. But if this top author didn’t get it, then a lot of readers [or agents, publishers, etc.] also wouldn’t. That didn’t mean I had to remove it from my book. It meant I had to do a better job of selling the sitaution with my writing.

Pulled from a headline as your plot framework. There’s nothing wrong with using a real-life incident to frame a work of fiction. There are plenty of really good books, famous ones even, that do this. It doesn’t diminish the writer. It’s up to the writer, though, to make the story their own and not feel licked in by what happened in real life. The major incident in my first book, Cold Hard News, was sparked by a real one in New Hampshire. But it’s not “based” on it, and in some ways it’s wildly different. In part, because I was unhappy with some of the real-life conclusions and writing my own story was a way to work that out.

At the beginning of this post, I mentioned an article in the paper that was similar to a book I’ve “been writing” for years. In fact, my book precedes the real-life incident. My first thought was, great, now my great, original idea is going to look like it’s not that original. But, of course, that’s silly. Not just silly because I momentarily fretted about a book I’ve been working on since 2018 that shows no sign of every being completed, but for the reasons I’ve written about today.

If anyone even read about, or remembers, the real-life incident, it may even help get attention for the book. In the end, it doesn’t really matter. What matters is the book itself, on its own merits. Is it well-written? Did I de-trope where necessary? Did I make even the unbelievable believable? Did I say what I wanted to say?

None of us are Shakespeare, but the lesson is the same. “Original” doesn’t matter. If you tell your story well, its origins won’t matter.

Posted in Maureen's Posts, Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 2 Comments

The Race Around the World

Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson here, this time with a post in honor of Women’s History Month. For once I will not be writing about a sixteenth-century woman.

Way back in 1988, after I had written a middle-grades biography of journalist Nellie Bly, I sold an article to Highlights for Children about one of her most famous exploits, her trip around the word in 1889. Her goal was to beat the fictional record set in Jules Verne’s novel, Around the World in Eighty Days, but my focus was on the fact that Nellie was not the only one in the race. Her competition was a rival journalist. Twenty-six-year-old Elizabeth Bisland was literary editor of Cosmopolitan Magazine, which published lengthy first-hand accounts of her adventures.

Elizabeth’s publisher proposed the idea that she travel in the opposite direction—west to east while Nellie went east to west. At first she resisted the idea. She was uncomfortable with the potential notoriety. In an age when many women believed their names should only appear in print when they were born, when they married, and when they died, Elizabeth did not even use a byline on articles she wrote for her magazine. Even more concerning was that she was given only five hours to prepare for a trip that would last for months. Nellie Bly left New Jersey at 9:30 AM on Thursday, November 14. Elizabeth boarded a train for San Francisco that same evening, her hastily assembled belongings packed in a steamer trunk, a Gladstone bag, and a “shawl strap.”

At first she made good time. She reached Japan on December 8 and was in Hong Kong on the 18th. Halfway to Singapore, her ship passed the one Nellie was on and when Nellie reached Hong Kong on December 22, she learned for the first time that not only was she was in a race, but that “the other woman” was “a good five days ahead of” her.

Elizabeth, meanwhile, traveled on to Ceylon, where she took another steamer to Italy. Boarding a mail train, she reached England two months after leaving New York. It was at that point, however, that her luck ran out. The weather turned against her and the voyage from England to New York took twelve days. She completed her trip in seventy-six days, beating the time of Jules Verne’s hero, but Nellie Bly had beaten both records, arriving back at her starting point in just seventy-two days, six hours, ten minutes, and eleven seconds.

Although she was probably glad to have avoided the notoriety, Elizabeth Bisland ended up regarding her adventure in a positive light. She wrote the following in one of her articles:

I was a young woman, quite alone, and doing a somewhat conspicuous and eccentric thing, yet throughout the entire journey I never met with other than the most exquisite and unfailing courtesy and consideration; and if I had been a princess with a suite of half a hundred people I could have felt no safer or happier. It seems to me this speaks very highly for the civilization existing in all traveled parts of the globe, when a woman’s strongest protection is the fact that she is unprotected.

Why do I have a feeling she might not have felt so safe if she made the same journey today?

Kathy Lynn Emerson/Kaitlyn Dunnett has had sixty-four books traditionally published and has self published others. She won the Agatha Award and was an Anthony and Macavity finalist for best mystery nonfiction of 2008 for How to Write Killer Historical Mysteries and was an Agatha Award finalist in 2015 in the best mystery short story category. In 2023 she won the Lea Wait Award for “excellence and achievement” from the Maine Writers and Publishers Alliance. She was the Malice Domestic Guest of Honor in 2014. She is currently working on creating new editions of her backlist titles. Her website is www.KathyLynnEmerson.com.

DON’T FORGET! One lucky Maine Crime Writers reader who leaves a comment on the blog this month will win a bundle of books!

 

Posted in Kaitlyn's Posts | Tagged , , , , , , | 6 Comments

Don’t Take Your Grammar For Granted

I’ve always prided myself on my good grammar, even calling myself a Grammar Nerd as a kid. I excelled in English classes throughout my school years, and I’ve always enjoyed editing as much as creative writing.

Proof of being a nerd. Sitting in front of the teacher. First Grade.

So, when my first manuscript came back from my editor with many (I mean, many) suggestions for commas and other punctuation, I was surprised. How could this have happened?

Okay, so I hadn’t been in school for decades by the time I published my first book, but I didn’t think I had lost that much skill. A few of the suggestions were misplaced—the content would have changed—and a few were in left field, but many were legitimate.

I believe my proficiency was affected, like the rest of the world, by too much exposure to poor grammar. Online writing is littered with errors, and even those articles that are well-written most likely follow the journalistic Associated Press (AP) style of writing, which isn’t the writing style of most books.

We have also become lazy due to the shortening of spelling and the omission of punctuation in texts, social media, and work chats, and the lack of writing real letters. And look what Twitter did to us by curbing an idea to one hundred and forty characters! Characters, not even word count!

Grammar in the United States is sadly atrocious. Even fifteen years ago, during my Master of Fine Arts, the program decided to add a grammar class because younger graduate students were entering with too little knowledge of punctuation.

I can almost see your eyebrows knitting together as you wonder if you, too, are now grammar-soft. Before you worry about where to start, I have two suggestions.

For novel and short-story writing, you should follow The Chicago Manual of Style (CMOS). It’s an industry standard, and you can’t go wrong.

The second idea is to actually embrace the value of AI, not to write your work but to check it. Grammarly is software that checks grammar much better than any built-in option. The simple punctuation option is free, too. Give it a try. The results are eye-opening.

Let me leave you with just one punctuation discussion to consider, and to illustrate why you want to follow the Chicago Style. To comma or not to comma, that is the question.

To Comma or Not to Comma

As a fan of commas—see, Nerd Girl—I have always added the third comma in a series, but lately, I’ve been hearing that it is an option. No, it’s not an option. If you’re a journalist following the AP style, you leave it out to save space.

If you are a novelist, you add it in per the Chicago style.

You want the second comma in a series of words, such as I went to the store and bought milk, cheese, and bread. Too often, that comma after cheese, famously called the Oxford comma, is missing. Sadly, the Oxford comma cost a Maine business, Oakhurst Dairy, millions due to a missing comma and overtime law. Definitely a win for the Oxford comma defenders to have a judge rule on punctuation!

A missing comma may not cost you five million dollars, but it could cost you your reputation, or an agent’s interest, or your self-respect (that would be me). It’s time to rescue this sinking grammar ship and make our grandparents proud. Then we can work on our penmanship.

                                                                    ***

Don’t forget! Leave a comment on any March blog post to be entered into a drawing for free books!

                                                                   ***

Allison Keeton writes the Midcoast Maine Mystery series. Arctic Green, Book Two, is now available. She can be reached at http://www.akeetonbooks.com

Posted in Uncategorized | 7 Comments

The Longtooth Follies

Ready Player One!

Longtooth Follies

John Clark succumbing to more dark humor. This month’s offering was inspired by Vaughn’s last post. Face it readers, we who blog here are getting up in age. Vaughn’s 79, I’m 78, and a certain unnamed sibling will hit 77 in July. I can’t speak for the other regulars, but I bet most of us are collecting, or within hoping distance of social security. How about the following scenario?

We begin reaching that scary point where we can no longer live independently. We’re fragile and creaky, but we still have all our marbles (maybe a lot more that the average geezer/geezerette). Maybe writing has become a chore, but the gray matter continues churning out cool stuff. How about we all move to the same assisted living facility?

Screw such mundane activities as decoupage and cookie decorating, forget troops of well-intentioned do-gooders coming in to sing or demonstrate crafts. We’re gonna come up with some doozies of our own to keep things lively. The following list is by no means complete, so I encourage you to submit your own.

1-’Let’s Swap Teeth.’ This has multiple iterations. We can fill a punch bowl with rum to kill germs, then everyone tosses their dentures in. Game One is played with the lights off. Each participant tries uppers and lowers until they think they have a match. First person to get a correct set wins a prize. The second iteration is called ‘who am I?’ Players get three tries to identify the dentures’ (properly paired beforehand) owners. Once again there’s a prize. Iteration three is ‘Who looks creepiest?’ Each player randomly inserts upper and lower dentures with everyone voting on which participant looks the creepiest. Winner gets to scare the crap out of a random staffer.

2-This time, we’re playing ‘Let’s get ahead.’ We break into the arts and crafts room after everyone goes to bed. Participants vie to create the goriest paper mache head. The one chosen as the winner is snuck into the staff refrigerator to elicit suitable screams.

3-’Helmet Hair Hockey’ requires the theft of two suitable wigs that are then sprayed with aerosol starch until they resemble the mouth of a large cave. Two players, one on offense, the other on defense maneuver a pilfered pill box up and down a hallway, using canes to propel the ‘puck’ First player to score six goals wins. Bruised shins are a sign of participation. Bonus for anyone willing to wear one of the ‘goals’ to breakfast the following morning.

4-’I want my Mummy’ requires a team effort. After picking the lock on the first aid closet and collecting all the Ace bandages, one player volunteers to be completely wrapped in the pilferage. This is best played on visiting day with one inmate/resident agreeing to skip family time so the wrapped individual can try convincing the visitors they’re the missing relative.

Where’s My Mummy?

5-’What the Hell is it?’ is another team exercise. Players must be able to steal portions of food blended for special diets and bribe food service staff to provide a list of foods included. Contestants are blindfolded while sampling the stolen purees. Winner is the one guessing the highest number of foods in the blend.

6-’Let’s play pool’ is perhaps the most challenging one of our planned games, especially since we heard what happened when residents at The Elwood Delp Home For The Depraved survived a near disaster, but more about that in a bit. Playing requires picking the lock on the therapy pool door. Players can choose bathing suits or go commando for this event. With the lights out, everyone enters the pool after choosing a leader. Said leader secretly designates a target. When the leader shouts ‘Marco,’ the target then yells ‘Rubio.’ They are free to take three steps in any direction. When caught, the target is submerged while the captor counts to half their age. If the target feels like passing out, they tap their captor who is supposed to release them immediately.

It is important to follow protocol with this game. At the Delp Home, they were in the midst of a rousing tournament when Thirma Sneed snuck into the pool from the memory care unit, and got so lost in her own fragmented thoughts that she damn near drowned Fingus Troon, former mayor of Rockland.

Those are my proposed high jinks. What might you add?

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | 7 Comments

What Readers Tell Me

Rob Kelley here, and I’m reflecting on who my readers are for my debut novel Raven and what they are telling me.

I was recently challenged by someone who knows book marketing to describe my ideal reader, and I realized that’s harder than it sounds. I have an acquaintance, a white collar professional to whom I mentioned that I’d just published my first novel, and when I described it, she said she couldn’t wait to read it. Awesome, of course, but I was surprised; I didn’t see her as someone who would like the book. So I clearly didn’t know exactly who my ideal reader was.

I also wasn’t sure what readers would like. I know what I like in novels, and definitely tried to emulate my favorite writers in the characterization, pacing, setting, and voice of the novel. I know my favorite scenes in the book, the ones I spent time crafting and polishing, especially the ending. I had two readers comment on the ending recently, one saying how much she enjoyed the ending, and another saying he was afraid it wasn’t going to turn out well for my protagonist, Mev Hayes. That was a useful thing to hear, because it meant that the level of tension I’d worked to create as my main character is in mortal danger, then in significant legal danger, was at the level I’d intended and the outcome wasn’t obvious.

A number of readers said they liked Mev (which was gratifying because one of the devastating critiques I got when I first tried to shop the book was that the main character was weak and underdeveloped. Yikes!). And, yes, readers came to despise my antagonist; also good. But it was reactions to my secondary characters that have surprised me. Mev’s co-conspirator, best friend (and maybe more), Jack, was one reader’s favorite, asking if the next book could be about him. (If I write a sequel, which isn’t currently planned, I’ll probably write it from his POV).

Even more surprising was one reader’s real appreciation for the secondary FBI character Carl. Carl was fun to write and his journey allowed me to explore issues of race, privilege, and power, parallel in many ways to the challenges Mev faces as a woman in the sciences in 1990. But what came back to me from that comment was that I’d made him a fully fleshed out character, someone who encouraged the reader to want more. (Carl does show up in a short story set after Raven, tentatively titled “Binary,” that I’ll put out as a Kindle Short sometime in the future.)

Writers, what do you hope your readers find compelling in your work, and readers, what are you looking for in crime novels and thrillers?

Currently reading The Doorman by Chris Pavone, 2025, and loving it.

Next in my TBR list: Super-Cannes, by J.G. Ballard, 2000. (I just learned about this novel. I’d have sworn I read everything Ballard had ever written!)

 

 

 

 

Posted in Rob's Posts | 5 Comments

Weekend Update: March 14-15, 2026

Next week at Maine Crime Writers there will be posts by Rob Kelley (Monday), John Clark (Tuesday), Kaitlyn Dunnett/Kathy Lynn Emerson (Thursday) and Maureen Milliken (Friday), with a writing tip from Allison Keeton on Wednesday.

In the news department, here’s what’s happening with some of us who blog regularly at Maine Crime Writers:

 

Matt Cost will be at the Dance Hall in Kittery on Monday, March 16th, at 6:30 PM for a Noir at the Bar. Maine Crime Writers Gabi Stiteler, Allison Keeton,  and Brenda Buchanan will be joined by some of the finest and scariest writers in New England. Cost will be reading from the book that scarred his relationship with his wife, Mainely Wicked, when she asked what dark place he was in when he wrote it.

 

 

An invitation to readers of this blog: Do you have news relating to Maine, Crime, or Writing? We’d love to hear from you. Just comment below to share.

And a reminder: If your library, school, or organization is looking for a speaker, we are often available to talk about the writing process, research, where we get our ideas, and other mysteries of the business, along with the very popular “Making a Mystery” with audience participation, and “Casting Call: How We Staff Our Mysteries.” We also do programs on Zoom. Contact Kate Flora

AND DON’T FORGET! One lucky Maine Crime Writers reader who leaves a comment on the blog this month will win a bundle of books!

Posted in Sunday Updates | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

For the Love of Layers

I’m forbidden from bringing any more rocks into the house.

It’s a difficult promise to keep. Living on the Maine coast, surrounded by 400-500 million-year-old metamorphic rock, I am constantly coming across a beautiful loose stone on the beach, at the lighthouse park, or in a preserve.

The metamorphic rock at Pemaquid Lighthouse.

My love for the landscape led me to take a geology course specific to the Pemaquid area. Mistake. My obsession with rocks has grown, and now I know that some are actually minerals, making them even more enticing.

Metamorphic rock is known for its layers formed under extreme heat or pressure. The result is a beautiful, interesting mix of colors, textures, and rock varieties.

Pemaquid Beach. Metamorphic Rock.

That is what the layers within your writing deliver to the reader.

Layers in writing come in many forms:

Character Depth. Who doesn’t love a character-driven story where both the protagonist and the antagonist have multiple sides to their personalities, showing both their strengths and their vulnerabilities? Sometimes we might even feel bad for, or root for, the antagonist. We relate emotionally to well-rounded characters by seeing ourselves in them.

Theme. Gabi Stiteler wrote a wonderful piece on Theme last year that I encourage you to re-read. Find it here: https://mainecrimewriters.com/2025/11/12/writing-tip-wednesday-its-all-about-theme/  A book’s theme, or overall meaning, is interwoven throughout the surface-level plot. Even a light-hearted cozy mystery, like the kind I love to write, explores deeper human conditions. Don’t sell your work short, believing it is too “simple” to have a theme.

Symbolism. Sometimes, a repeated symbol or motif enriches the story beyond the plot, such as a bird of prey foreshadowing a danger or a key signaling a secret. The subtle repetitions will build.

Plot Enrichments. We all started on Dick and Jane or similar simple stories. See Jane Run. Well, if Jane actually ran away, hid, or was tripped, that would have added a more interesting layer to the simple plot. Readers stay engaged when there is suspense or intrigue, as they piece together a mystery, wait for an outcome, or hold their breath in a chase scene.

Relatable Work. Layers will hit readers in different ways. You may touch a reader, or make a reader nostalgic or laugh, or cause a reader to put the book down due to a painful memory. However it affects the reader, the work will be remembered.

Re-reading. Often, layered stories are valued and re-read, and a new thought or feeling resonates. Two of my favorite books are The Great Gatsby by Fitzgerald and The Hours by Cunningham. Yes, I’ve re-read them, and yes, they stay with me.

It’s one thing to say that layering is important, and it’s another thing to do it. I’m not implying it is easy, but that is why you have first drafts, tenth drafts, writers’ groups, beta readers, and time to put the manuscript away to let it marinate.

Our dogs, Kelton and Roger, along the rocks of the Pemaquid River.

Regarding my rock promise, I’ve left many intact where they are and where they belong, now taking only a few for the edges of my herb garden. The exceptions are the heart-shaped ones. Too tempting not to bring inside. Shhh, don’t give me away.

Found Hearts, both rock and mineral.

Happy Writing!

                                                                ***

Don’t forget! Leave a comment on any March blog post to be entered into a drawing for free books!

                                                                  ***

Allison Keeton writes the Midcoast Maine Mystery series. Arctic Green, Book Two, is now available. She can be reached at http://www.akeetonbooks.com

Arctic Green, Book Two, Midcoast Maine Mystery series

Posted in Uncategorized | 9 Comments

To Market To Market . . .

Kate Flora: I was digging through some old files this week, looking for information on the history of the New England Crime Bake. What I found along the way amused me and perhaps will amuse you as well.

Back in 1993, when I sold my first book, my husband Ken congratulated me and said, “Now you have two jobs. Your job as a writer and your job marketing the books.” Like many another writer, marketing is not my forte. I like the part of the writer’s life that involves being all alone, at my desk, living in my head, watching my characters and story evolve. But he was right. Since 1994, when Chosen for Death was published, I’ve been looking for creative ways to promote the books.

While I was digging, I found two very amusing attempts at promotion. First, a cardboard gun, imprinted with book information, that, when it is pulled forcefully through the air, makes a bang and a small banner pops out. That one was fun. Alas, when I went to get more for the next book, the price had gone up so much it was out of my price range. Then there was the giant red plastic paperclip, imprinted with my book information. Like the gun, it was soon too expensive for an ill-paid author to afford.

Brother John in the Educated Death tee shirt

Publishing is a very insecure business. Writers’ series are always being dropped, even when they’re earning money. Publishers are always drawn to the bright and shiny new object over the steady and reliable author. So when my Thea Kozak series looked like it was about to die, I made a bunch of tee shirts with the book title and the message: Buy This Book or Thea Dies. Thea didn’t die, but that was because another publisher, Jim Huang at The Mystery Company picked up the series. I am forever grateful.

 

 

 

Then there are the postcards. I still have postcards for many books in my files, in case someone out there collects author’s postcards. Sometimes I did postcards. Sometimes I did bookmarks. Sometimes I did both. And sometimes, according to my files, I didn’t do either of those things. But it may simply be that I have a very small office with 20+ years of  manuscripts, research files, correspondence, clippings, files from my service on local and national boards promoting mystery writers, and books. Tons and tons of books. It is a miracle that the floor hasn’t collapsed and dumped the whole mess onto the living room floor below.

Author photos? The first time my publisher asked for one of those, my cleaning man, known as The Dread Cleaner Robert, had been a professional photographer, so he snapped a bunch of photos and I sent them along to New York. Photos one and two are from Robert. Then I got a professional one. Then, too busy to get a photo taken, I headed out into the yard in our rental in Florida and our house guest took a picture. Most recently, I’m back to a professional photo and Ali Rosa, from Ali Rosa photography, make my 75-year-old self look pretty darn good.

I also used to do a newsletter, which I am about to revive. If you’d like to be on the mailing list for recipes, new publications, and general stuff about the world of publishing and promotion, send me an email from my website, http://www.kateclarkflora.com or at writingaboutcrime@gmail.com

And by the way, got any great ideas for my next promo?

Posted in Kate's Posts | 1 Comment

To Go Long or To Go Short

I have been on a run with short stories the past few years. Five sold to Ellery Queen in the past three years. Two to Alfred Hitchcock. Luck with four other collections or anthologies. A piece of flash fiction in Shotgun Honey. The last two years, I’ve been short-listed for the Best American Mystery and Suspense, nominated for the Robert L. Fish Award by the Mystery Writers of America for my first short story, and recipient of the Bodwell Fellowship for the Maine Writers and Publisher Alliance.

Lately, I’ve been working on something longer about Pittsburgh in the 1980s. I was born in Pittsburgh and grew up in northwestern PA. Erie. Pittsburgh. Waterford. Greensburg. Somerset. Windber. With dairy farms and coal mines and lake effect snow.

I’m still asking a lot of the same questions about family and loyalty and independence. Still thinking about what sorts of lines a person is willing to cross for the people they love.

The process has been very rewarding. But it’s also been tough.

Specifically, staying in a groove.

As I’ve mentioned, I have two kids. They are great. My two favorite things. Funny and fun and very active. But kids require food and water and attention. They have sporting interests and other interests not related to sports.  Which means my afternoon, evening, and weekend routines are not regular. But I’m still getting it done. I knocked out a scene sitting on the floor at my younger son’s basketball practice. I knocked out another scene at my older son’s batting practice at the Picklr in Westbrook where there is a secret batting practice in a creepy back room.

I travel a lot for my job. It’s good, hard work. But my routine is finding an hour at the end of the day and an hour in the morning and an hour on a plane. I’ve drafted scenes at hotel rooms in Storrs and Easton, Connecticut, in  Warwick, Rhode Island, or on an island in Maine. I’ve reworked them in my mother-in-law’s basement outside Bangor. At the beautiful La Quinta in Texas. At a park in Reno.

I did finish another draft. It is sitting at around 45,000 words. Which is either 40,000 words too short or 40,000 words too long.

I’m up against some issues that are pretty common with writers of short fiction. Things are compressed. Some scenes read like screen-writing – all stage directions and dialogue. I’m missing interiority in some places and world-building in others. Perhaps I’m underutilizing the secondary characters and subplots.

If you write, I’m curious about your process. Do you go long and then have to edit down? Are you a pantser? Or do you plot everything out?

A few updates:

You can catch my latest story in the March/April Alfred Hitchcock Mystery Magazine. It’s called “Generous Strike Zone” and was written at my older son’s baseball practice. The editor of AHMM said it was “haunting.” You’ve been warned.

“The Best and Sweetest Things” is my second story with Sloane, a Portland-based private investigator. She’s going to be a fun recurring character. It’s out in the May/June Ellery Queen.

And finally, I have another Annie story out in the July/August Ellery Queen called “A Well-Worn Path.” This one takes place in Portland and involves the disappearance of a comfort care companion who happens to be a refugee.  I wrote this story in November of 2024. It’s going to land a little different now.

For events:

 

 

 

 

 

  • On March 15, I’ll be at the Kittery Dancehall for a Seacoast Noir at the Bar. Doors open at 6:00.
  • On April 10, I’ll be at the Bloom & Doom event in Old Town at Kanu (283 Main Street) at 7:00pm.
  • On April 15, I wish I could be at the Murder in Mud Season event at the Rockport Public Library. It’s going to be amazing. Doors at 6:00. (I will be in Reno. You know. For work.)
  • On April 29, I’ll be in New York for the Edgars.
  • On May 29 and 30, I will be in Portland for the Maine Crime Wave. It is going to be AMAZING. If you haven’t registered yet, you can do it now. Information is HERE.

 

Posted in Gabi's Posts | 9 Comments

Weekend Update: March 7-8, 2026

Next week at Maine Crime Writers there will be posts by Joe Souza (Monday), Gabi Stiteler (Tuesday), Kate Flora (Thursday) and Allison Keeton (Friday).

In the news department, here’s what’s happening with some of us who blog regularly at Maine Crime Writers:

Kate Flora: I’m going to start a quarterly newsletter. If you’d like to be on the mailing list, send me a message using the form at www.kateclarkflora.com

Our bundle of books winner for February is Alice, whose email is asdsmiles@gmail.com Alice, can you send us your snail mail address so we can mail the books? Send to writingaboutcrime@gmail.com

Matt Cost has the beginning of calendar of book events for the year. There will be more to come, but this is a good start. Come say hi at one of these places. Or reach out to him at matthew-cost@comcast.net if you or your organization would like him to come speak or set up an author event for you.

Eager for spring? So are we. And we have a question for you. Should we revive our “Where Would You Put the Body?” photo contest?

An invitation to readers of this blog: Do you have news relating to Maine, Crime, or Writing? We’d love to hear from you. Just comment below to share.

And a reminder: If your library, school, or organization is looking for a speaker, we are often available to talk about the writing process, research, where we get our ideas, and other mysteries of the business, along with the very popular “Making a Mystery” with audience participation, and “Casting Call: How We Staff Our Mysteries.” We also do programs on Zoom. Contact Kate Flora

 

AND DON’T FORGET! One lucky Maine Crime Writers reader who leaves a comment on the blog this month will win a bundle of books!

Posted in Sunday Updates | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment