The James Patterson Method


I can understand why James Patterson has a stable of writers writing his novels. He’s an idea guy and freely admits that he’s not the best stylist when it comes to putting words down on paper. Sixty Minutes did a story about him years back and asked him what he was working on. Patterson proceeded to open a file cabinet and pull out a drawer, showing the interviewer thirty to forty ideas he had come up with.

What do you think of this method? I have mixed feelings on account that Patterson is such a generous and giving author. Some may think that Patterson having a stable of authors pumping out his novels is abhorrent, and in some ways I agree. Yet on the other hand, look at the careers he’s nurtured and grown. I’m sure the authors working with Patterson are happy, both financially and professionally, after aligning themselves with him. Everyone is doing well and making money. And the readers are still lapping up his books and making Patterson one of the richest and most celebrated authors in the world.

On the other hand . . . It feels like a factory, pumping out formulaic novel after formulaic novel. It’s similar to the movie industry putting out sequels and those stupid superhero movies. Honestly, I can’t read a Patterson novel. They seem like fluff to me. It is a literary sweatshop run by a wealthy overlord.

And yet I too have many ideas that I’d love to get out in the world. But how can I possibly do this in one lifetime. I, too, feel that my ability to generate ideas sometimes outweighs my skills as a writer. Currently, I’m plodding along with my newest book while the ideas keep coming to me. What if I could hire some talented writers to take my ideas and run with them? Would I do it, especially if I knew that this would make me a lot of money? Sadly, I think I would. As it stands, most of these brilliant plots I’ve devised will never make it out into the world because of time constraints.

Also, it would be fun to branch off and write about different topics. A literary novel, maybe. I definitely would write more horror and sci-fi stories. Often in this business, writers get pigeonholed into a certain genre and find it hard to break out. Their fans expect it. The publishers expects it. Their literary agent works in a specific genre.

I’ve always been an idea guy. They come to me all the time. Sometimes it starts with a character I’ve thought about. Other times an interesting idea comes to mind that no one has explored. Or a clever ending. I recently discovered a bizarre and fascinating medical case that is little known, but would be an intriguing physical trait for one of my characters. If I see two people arguing on the street, I concoct dialogue in my head to set the scene. While driving, I provide names to the pedestrians walking along the sidewalk. Everything in life is a narrative, every interaction a potential storyline. A train coming out of a tunnel. A woman walking a dog and looking upset. Two people in front of me at a baseball game and taking about their marriages. As a writer, I see life that way. I see stories in everything and everybody, which is why my head is full of plot ideas.

Yes, the next step is AI writing novels, but that’s a subject for another day. I’m just interested where you guys stand on this. Are you an idea guy or a word stylist? Or maybe you‘re a combination of the two. In this regard, I think every writer is on the spectrum somewhere. Maybe for me it’s because the ideas come easy without the slog of having to sit down and put these ideas into paper with my words. Then creating sentences. Paragraphs then become chapters. Writing is hard. Very hard, my dudes. Editing is hard too. But let them ideas keep coming.

In any case, my new novel, THE ANCHORMAN’S WIFE, is on sale this week for .99 cents. Where can you get a deal that good? For one third the price of your coffee, you’ll be able to spend a few days with some backbiting and evil characters. https://www.amazon.com/Anchormans-Wife-Novel-Joseph-Souza-ebook/dp/B0CFX6C1VP?ref_=ast_author_mpb

Happy New Year and enjoy your reading and writing!

About joesouza

I am a writer of crime novels
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

11 Responses to The James Patterson Method

  1. matthewcost says:

    Great insight on the dichotomy that is James Patterson! Should he even be considered a ‘writer’? I believe that to be a writer you have to have an idea, research it, write it, edit it, and promote it. That is the full spectrum of what it means to be a writer.

  2. Rick Simonds says:

    Patterson was once my favorite go-to author but I now feel “his” work has suffered greatly and I avoid most of his offerings. But, if as you suggest, he contacted me with a desire to collaborate, I would jump at the chance.

  3. Anonymous says:

    I think there are more than one “super” writers out there who are doing the JP method. Just look at the best sellers on Amazon. The top ten are usually filleld with multiple books by teh same authors. I know there are authors out there that can pump out a book a month, but mosts can’t. ONwards. I take three months to do what should take one. Now on to the grand finally of The Topped Toff, The Lakeside Dower House Series.

  4. Alice says:

    I stopped reading JP when he became a factory.

  5. John Clark says:

    Does this mean I’ll get in trouble for all the scribes I’ve got chained it the cave out behind my house?

  6. Didn’t the writing world have the same dilemma with James Michener twenty or thirty years ago. He established a prestigious writing center at the University of Texas at Austin and nurtured a lot of students. But his books were, as I always understood it, written by groups of students who also did the necessary research.

  7. kaitcarson says:

    I know some JP writers, they are all very enthusiastic. I have stopped reading him, but I don’t know if it’s because of the formula or if my tastes changed.

    As for multi-genre releases, Joe, that’s what pen names are for!

  8. jselbo says:

    I too stopped reading JP. I am a fan of structure but not formula. Great post

  9. Sandra Neily says:

    re: millionaire authors w tons of books. I’m loving the Reacher series (Lee Child) on Amazon and loving how the man they hired to play Reacher embodies him in every detail, large and small. Reminds me of Stephen King’s admonition about details, even if it’s just the “overturned bicycle” in an alley. I think JP lost that. It’s fascinating how Reacher anchors this series, how most everything radiates out from him no matter how novel the plot and despite so many books in the series and perhaps rooms of co-authors. This was a GREAT post for thinking about it all, esp with AI looming. Thanks!

  10. Anonymous says:

    I read every JP book when he was writing them himself. Now I check the ratings on Barnes & Noble before I read any of his collaborations. I’ve found that if it has at least a 4 star rating on B&N, it is a good read. Any rating less than that, I take a pass.

Leave a Reply